Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

06:34
Evaluation of Left Ventricular Structure and Function using 3D Echocardiography
Published on: October 28, 2020
4.0K
Utility of 3D Echocardiography for Device Sizing During Transcatheter ASD Closure: A Comparative Study
Avinash Mani1, Sivadasanpillai Harikrishnan2, Bijulal Sasidharan2
1Department of Cardiology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology (SCTIMST), Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. avinashmani1@gmail.com.
Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
|October 30, 2023
Summary
Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D TEE) effectively guides atrial septal defect (ASD) device sizing, offering an alternative to traditional 2D TEE. This method ensures accurate device selection for transcatheter ASD closure.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Echocardiography
Background:
- Two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (2D TEE) is standard for assessing patients undergoing transcatheter atrial septal defect (ASD) device closure.
- Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D TEE) offers high-resolution en-face ASD imaging but is underutilized.
- Comparative analysis of 3D and 2D TEE for ASD device planning is needed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of 3D TEE and 2D TEE in assessing atrial septal defects (ASDs) for device closure planning.
- To evaluate the correlation between 3D TEE measurements and actual device size used in transcatheter ASD closure.
- To develop a predictive equation for device size using 3D TEE parameters.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, observational study over one year.
- Patients undergoing transcatheter ASD device closure had baseline 2D and 3D TEE assessments.
- Defect characteristics were compared between modalities; regression analysis was used to predict device size.
Main Results:
- Thirty patients (83% female, mean age 40.5 years) were included.
- Good agreement was found between 2D and 3D TEE for ASD diameters.
- 3D TEE defect area and circumference strongly correlated with final device size, enabling a predictive equation.
Conclusions:
- Device sizing using 3D TEE parameters alone is as effective as 2D TEE for transcatheter ASD closure.
- 3D TEE provides valuable data for accurate device selection in ASD interventions.
- This study supports the increased adoption of 3D TEE in ASD device planning.

