Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical and genomic predictors of sipuleucel-T outcomes in men with metastatic androgen pathway modulator resistant prostate cancer.

Research square·2026
Same author

Mechanics of Long-Shank 5 mm Neural Probe Insertion into the Rat Brain: Effects of Geometry and Vibration-Assisted Insertion.

Micromachines·2026
Same author

NAB2::STAT6 fusion proteins drive nuclear condensate formation and transcriptional reprogramming in solitary fibrous tumors.

Cancer letters·2026
Same author

EMTscore infers divergent EMT pathways from omics data and enables rapid screening for EMT-associated gene sets.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Rewiring miR-22/SNAI1 via CRISPR-based edge editing destabilizes the epithelial phenotype.

NPJ systems biology and applications·2026
Same author

Electrochemical characterization and chronic stability of Utah electrode arrays for intracortical microstimulation.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models
14:14

Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models

Published on: August 12, 2018

8.9K

NeurostimML: A machine learning model for predicting neurostimulation-induced tissue damage.

Yi Li1,2, Rebecca A Frederick3, Daniel George4

  • 1Department of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.

Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
|October 31, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning accurately predicts neural tissue damage from electrical stimulation. A Random Forest model achieved 88.3% accuracy, outperforming traditional methods for safer neuromodulation.

Keywords:
Shannon equationmachine learningneuromodulationsafe stimulation

More Related Videos

Rodent Behavioral Testing to Assess Functional Deficits Caused by Microelectrode Implantation in the Rat Motor Cortex
10:42

Rodent Behavioral Testing to Assess Functional Deficits Caused by Microelectrode Implantation in the Rat Motor Cortex

Published on: August 18, 2018

8.9K
A Tissue Displacement-based Contusive Spinal Cord Injury Model in Mice
07:59

A Tissue Displacement-based Contusive Spinal Cord Injury Model in Mice

Published on: June 18, 2017

11.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models
14:14

Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models

Published on: August 12, 2018

8.9K
Rodent Behavioral Testing to Assess Functional Deficits Caused by Microelectrode Implantation in the Rat Motor Cortex
10:42

Rodent Behavioral Testing to Assess Functional Deficits Caused by Microelectrode Implantation in the Rat Motor Cortex

Published on: August 18, 2018

8.9K
A Tissue Displacement-based Contusive Spinal Cord Injury Model in Mice
07:59

A Tissue Displacement-based Contusive Spinal Cord Injury Model in Mice

Published on: June 18, 2017

11.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Neuroscience
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Predicting electrical stimulation-induced neural tissue damage is crucial for safe neuromodulation.
  • Existing methods rely on limited stimulation parameters, leading to potential inaccuracies.
  • Developing a more comprehensive predictive model is essential for advancing research and clinical applications.

Approach:

  • Compiled a database of 387 stimulation parameter sets from 58 studies spanning 47 years.
  • Utilized ordinal encoding and Random Forest for feature selection.
  • Investigated Logistic Regression, K-nearest Neighbor, Random Forest, and Multilayer Perceptron models for classification.

Key Points:

  • The Random Forest model identified key features including waveform shape, geometric surface area, pulse width, frequency, amplitude, charge, current density, duty cycle, and daily stimulation metrics.
  • The Random Forest algorithm achieved 88.3% accuracy in predicting tissue damage.
  • This significantly outperformed the Shannon equation's accuracy of 63.9%.

Conclusions:

  • The developed Random Forest model offers a more reliable prediction of stimulation-induced neural tissue damage.
  • This approach facilitates informed decision-making for neuromodulation parameter selection in research and clinical settings.
  • This study pioneers the use of machine learning for predicting neural tissue damage, paving the way for ML-driven neurostimulation.