Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

133
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
133
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

44
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
44
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

104
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
104
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

154
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
154
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine02:50

Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine

4.9K
Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
4.9K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

57
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
57

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Characterizing public participation in Prescription Drug User Fee Act reauthorization, 2010-2021.

Health affairs scholar·2026
Same author

Reforming Medicare payment for skin substitutes-ripping off the bandage.

Health affairs scholar·2026
Same author

Assessment of Patient-Centered Content on Left Ventricular Assist Devices on US Hospital Webpages.

Circulation. Population health and outcomes·2026
Same author

Haploidentical transplant, gene therapy, and standard care in sickle cell disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Blood·2026
Same author

Orphan Designation for Drugs Approved in the United States and European Union: A Comparative Analysis.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2026
Same author

Rising Hypertension Mortality Rates Are Independent of Coding Drift.

Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.1K

Clinical Phenotyping with an Outcomes-driven Mixture of Experts for Patient Matching and Risk Estimation.

Nathan C Hurley1, Sanket S Dhruva2, Nihar R Desai3

  • 1Texas A&M University, USA.

ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare
|November 1, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a novel deep mixture of experts model to match patients and predict major adverse events. The approach effectively identifies patient phenotypes and predicts mortality risk in acute myocardial infarction, aiding personalized treatment strategies.

Keywords:
Cardiologycardiovascular outcomesmachine learningmedical information systemsmixture of experts

More Related Videos

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.2K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.1K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.2K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Informatics
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Cardiology

Background:

  • Observational medical data offer valuable insights but require robust matching techniques for patient comparisons.
  • Existing methods face limitations in verifying if variables for treatment decisions also predict adverse event risks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a deep mixture of experts approach for simultaneously matching patients and modeling major adverse event risk.
  • To validate the model's ability to identify patient phenotypes and predict outcomes using real-world medical data.

Main Methods:

  • A deep mixture of experts model was employed to jointly learn patient matching and risk prediction.
  • The model was trained on treatment and outcome data, then decomposed into a phenotype-clustering network.
  • Validation was performed on a dataset of acute myocardial infarction patients with cardiogenic shock.

Main Results:

  • The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85 ± 0.01 for predicting mortality.
  • Five distinct patient phenotypes were identified from pre-treatment information.
  • The approach demonstrated effective patient stratification and outcome prediction.

Conclusions:

  • The deep mixture of experts model offers a powerful tool for analyzing observational data by jointly addressing patient matching and risk prediction.
  • The identified phenotypes can enhance outcomes modeling and support the evaluation of individualized treatment effects.
  • This methodology advances the use of machine learning for personalized medicine in critical care settings.