Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025
Laboratory and Field Protocol for Estimating Sheet Erosion Rates from Dendrogeomorphology
Published on: January 7, 2019
Quantifying interactions between slope gradient, slope length and rainfall intensity on sheet erosion on steep slopes
Fangying Shi1, Fengbao Zhang2, Nan Shen2
1State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, The Research Center of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Education, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, PR China; Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, CAS and MWR, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, PR China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, PR China.
Abstract:
Understanding the interactions between influencing factors on sheet erosion is crucial for model development and mechanism elucidation. Simulation rainfall tests using a full-factorial design were conducted in 0.4 m wide flumes with five slope lengths (0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, and 2 m), five slope gradients (17.63, 26.79, 36.40, 46.63 and 57.74 %) and five rainfall intensities (48.0, 62.4, 102.0, 148.5, and 170.1 mm·h-1) to quantity interactions between these factors on sheet erosion and runoff rate by using Multiple Linear Regression. The results revealed that adding all two-way interaction terms into the equation, such as Rainfall intensity ∗ Slope length (IL), Slope gradient ∗ Rainfall intensity (SI) and Slope gradient ∗ Slope length (SL), significantly improved the interpretation of erosion and runoff rate. Under various slope gradients, the interaction item IL had a negative impact on erosion rate with an average slope of -0.86, but a positive impact on runoff rate with an average slope of 4.33, which improved the interpretation of regression equations for erosion and runoff rate by 0.86 %-1.83 % and 0.21 %-0.47 %. SI exhibited a positive effect on both erosion and runoff rate with an average slope of 4.36 and 8.44, and enhanced the interpretation for erosion and runoff rate by 0.70 %-3.54 % and 0.02 %-0.32 % under various slope lengths. SL had a negative effect on both erosion and runoff rate with an average slope of -3.55 and -6.93, and increased the interpretation of erosion and runoff rate by 1.15 %-6.84 % and 0.10 %-2.26 % under various rainfall intensities. The roles of I and S on erosion and runoff are both mutually promoting, of S and L are both mutually hindering, and of I and L on erosion are mutually hindering but on runoff are mutually promoting. Additionally, the interactions between I, L and S were even higher than that of a single influencing factor in some cases. Our findings highlight the need to consider the two-way interactions between influencing factors when predicting soil loss and provide methodological guidance for quantifying the interactions on soil erosion.
Related Concept Videos
01:25Multiple Regression
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...
01:11Regression Analysis
In regression analysis, a regression equation is determined based on the line of best fit– a line that best fits the data points plotted in a graph. This line is also called the regression line. The algebraic equation for the regression line is called the regression equation. It is represented as:
01:18Microsoft Excel: Regression Analysis
To perform regression...
01:11Residuals and Least-Squares Property
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...
01:27Design Example: Design of an Irrigation Channel
00:53Correlation and Regression