Chaotic signal denoising based on energy selection TQWT and adaptive SVD

Aiming at the problem of denoising chaotic signals with low signal-to-noise ratio and unknown dynamic system parameters, a new chaotic signal denoising algorithm is proposed, which combines adjustable Q-factor wavelet transform (TQWT) and adaptive singular value decomposition (ASVD). This method uses TQWT to decompose the noisy chaotic signal. According to the maximum wavelet entropy theory and energy threshold rule, the subband of TQWT is accurately divided into signal subband and noise subband. For noise subbands, adaptive SVD is used to denoise them, to achieve preliminary denoising. In ASVD, the standard deviation of the singular value subset is used to determine the effective reconstruction order to improve the noise suppression effect. To further remove noise in the signal subband, TQWT reconstruction is performed on the preliminarily denoised signal, and ASVD is used to denoise the reconstructed signal again to obtain the chaotic signal after secondary denoising. Chua's simulated signal and four kinds of underwater radiated noise measured by TQWT-ASVD were denoised, and compared with the SVD denoising method, TQWT denoising method, complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise and threshold denoising method (CEEMDAN-WT) and modified ensemble empirical mode decomposition combined with least squares denoising method (MEEMD-LMS), The experimental results show that the TQWT-ASVD method can reduce the noise of chaotic signals more effectively. Compared with SVD, TQWT, CEEMDAN-WT, MEEMD-LMS, and Chua's signal denoising method, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of this method increased by 23.22%, 26.46%, 18.79%, 16.11% the root mean square error (RMSE) decreased by 32.53%,39.48%, 30.96%, 27.94%, and the row entropy (PE) decreased by 40.44%, 41.96%, 22.78%, 20.59%; After reducing the radiation noise of cargo ships, the PE value of this method is reduced by 13.91%, 10.18%, 10.88%, 8.68% respectively, and the FE value is reduced by 33.66%, 31.42%, 26.98%, 21.32% respectively.