Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Esophageal Heat Transfer for Patient Temperature Control and Targeted Temperature Management
Published on: November 21, 2017
Are Intra-operative Forced Air Warming Devices a Possible Source for Contamination During Hand Surgery?
Anthony Gemayel1, Kyle Flikkema2, Germaine Fritz2
1Orthopedic Surgery, New York University (NYU) Langone, New York, USA.
Forced air warming (FAW) devices may not significantly increase surgical site infection risk. Further research is needed in active operating rooms to confirm these findings on FAW contamination potential.
Area of Science:
- Infection control in surgical environments
- Microbiology of operating rooms
- Healthcare-associated infection prevention
Background:
- Forced air warming (FAW) devices are standard for patient temperature management in operating rooms.
- Concerns exist regarding FAW devices as potential sources of surgical site infections (SSIs) and contamination.
- Conflicting evidence necessitates further investigation into FAW's role in operating room contamination.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the potential for bacterial contamination from forced air warming (FAW) devices in operating rooms.
- To determine if FAW devices contribute to airborne bacterial levels in the surgical field.
- To assess the risk of SSIs associated with FAW device usage.
Main Methods:
- 144 petri dishes were randomized into control and experimental groups (72 each).
- Dishes were placed at three locations (floor, table, operative limb) and sampled at 1, 2, and 3 hours.
- Bacterial growth was analyzed after 48 hours; FAW device hoses were also cultured.
Main Results:
- No bacterial growth was observed from FAW device hose cultures.
- No significant difference in airborne bacteria was found at 1 hour.
- Increased bacterial counts were noted near the operative limb at 2 hours and on the floor at 3 hours in the experimental group, but overall differences were not significant.
Conclusions:
- The study did not find a statistically significant risk of contamination from FAW devices.
- Study limitations include the absence of operating room staff during testing.
- Further research in active operating rooms with simulated staff movement is recommended to validate findings.
More Related Videos
06:43Studying Microbial Communities In Vivo: A Model of Host-mediated Interaction Between Candida Albicans and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in the Airways
Published on: January 13, 2016
06:25Cooling or Warming the Esophagus to Reduce Esophageal Injury During Left Atrial Ablation in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: March 15, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Hand hygiene
Hand washing...
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Methods of Sterilization II: Chemical Methods
Using chemical sterilization rather than heat to clean out equipment is recommended. It eradicates and removes all bacteria,...
Methods of Sterilization I: Physical Methods
Steam sterilization uses non-toxic, low-cost moist heat in the form of saturated steam under pressure, which is fast, microbicidal, and sporicidal, and quickly warms and penetrates fabrics. Autoclaves, or steam sterilizers, expose each item to direct steam contact for a predetermined time at the necessary...
Handwashing II: Pre-procedure and Initial Procedure Steps
The hand washing procedure itself includes the following steps. First, cover cuts, if any, on hands with a waterproof dressing. Cuts and abrasions can become contaminated with bacteria hindering the ability to clean the area thoroughly. In addition, repeated hand washing can worsen an injury. The nails must be short and clean, without nail...
Handwashing III: During the Procedure and Post-Procedure Steps