Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Inactivation of high-risk flags for suicide in the Veterans Health Administration: Association of documentation
Lauren M Denneson1, Sara A Hannon1, Katie L McDonald1
1Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System.
Abstract:
Medical record high-risk flags for suicide indicate patients are receiving enhanced care and alert treating providers to patients' high-risk status. Risk of suicide mortality remains high after flag inactivation, suggesting a need to improve inactivation determinations. This study describes variation in flag inactivation documentation, examines whether documentation varies by patient or facility characteristics, and explores the association between inactivation documentation type and subsequent suicide attempts. In a national sample of veterans with a documented suicide attempt who received a high-risk flag for suicide (n = 224), medical record review was used to categorize provider documentation of the rationale and procedures for high-risk flag inactivation. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to examine patient and facility characteristics associated with flag inactivation documentation type and to examine the association between documentation type and subsequent suicide attempts. Flag inactivation documentation fell into one of two categories: documentation stating the patient no longer met criteria for the high-risk flag (minimal documentation; n = 98, 43.8%); and documentation that included a review of one or more criteria for high-risk flag inactivation (more than minimal documentation; n = 126, 56.3%). Flag inactivation documentation was not associated with patient or facility characteristics. Veterans with minimal documentation (vs. more than minimal) were more likely to have a suicide attempt after flag inactivation (adjusted odds ratio, AOR = 2.20; 95% CI [1.01, 4.78]; p = .046). Findings suggest a need to better understand flag inactivation procedures in place and to develop a set of standardized procedures to reduce risk of premature high-risk flag inactivation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Related Concept Videos
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities

