Exploratory analysis of evasion actions of powered two-wheeler conflicts at unsignalized intersection

The study investigates the braking and steering evasions of powered two-wheelers (PTWs) during severe conflicts observed at an unsignalized intersection. Traffic conflicts were detected using a surrogate safety indicator called anticipated collision time (ACT). Then the peak-over-threshold approach was used to identify the severe conflicts and the evasive actions. Conflicts between right-turning PTWs and through-moving vehicles, through-moving PTWs crossing through-moving vehicles, and merging/diverging PTWs were analyzed using the minimum ACT (ACT_min), maximum deceleration rate (DR_max), maximum yaw rate (YR_max), and time of evasive action (TEA). The evasive actions were classified into five categories: driver/rider error, no-evasion, braking-only, steering-only, and both braking and steering. Analysis reveals that right-turning PTWs experience higher crash risk (0.7 %) than the other movements. PTW riders primarily employ extreme steering maneuvers (greater than 13 degrees/s) to evade conflicts, whereas braking rates lie in the normal ranges (less than 1.5 m/s²). The time of evasive action varies between 2.04 and 2.44 s, with the right-turning PTW riders responding early. Through-moving riders commit errors while evading severe conflicts and perform fewer evasive actions than right-turning and merging/diverging riders. Right-turning riders perform more steering-only evasions than braking-only, whereas the riders involved in the other two conflicts execute more braking-only evasions. These findings suggest that conflict type influences riders' braking and steering responses. Hence, future applications in advanced driver/rider assistance systems and training programs should consider appropriate evasive action strategies for different conflict types.