Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lumbar microdiscectomy: a contrary opinion.

C A Fager

    Clinical Neurosurgery
    |January 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Appropriate patient selection and surgical approach are key for successful ruptured lumbar disc operations. Lumbar microdiscectomy offers no benefit when surgery is clearly needed, increasing risks from poor exposure and incomplete decompression.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Progress and paradox.

    Surgical neurology·2001
    Same author

    Laminectomy and kyphotic deformity.

    Journal of neurosurgery·2001
    Same author

    Outpatient cervical spine surgery.

    Journal of neurosurgery·1998
    Same author

    Anterior cervical foraminotomy.

    Journal of neurosurgery·1996
    Same author

    Herniated lumbar disc.

    Journal of neurosurgery·1994
    Same author

    Arthroscopic discectomy.

    Journal of neurosurgery·1994

    Area of Science:

    • Neurosurgery
    • Orthopedic Surgery
    • Spinal Surgery

    Background:

    • Ruptured lumbar disc surgery requires careful patient selection and tailored operative approaches.
    • The effectiveness of surgical intervention depends on matching the technique to the disc fragment's characteristics.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the indications and outcomes of surgical interventions for ruptured lumbar discs.
    • To assess the specific benefits and risks of lumbar microdiscectomy in relation to patient selection and surgical approach.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of surgical cases involving ruptured lumbar discs.
    • Analysis of patient selection criteria and operative techniques employed.
    • Comparison of outcomes based on the chosen surgical approach, including lumbar microdiscectomy.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Successful outcomes are contingent upon precise patient selection and operative strategy.
    • Lumbar microdiscectomy does not offer advantages in cases with clear surgical indications.
    • Inadequate exposure and incomplete decompression are associated with lumbar microdiscectomy, increasing surgical risks.

    Conclusions:

    • Optimal surgical outcomes for ruptured lumbar discs depend on careful patient and approach selection.
    • Lumbar microdiscectomy may introduce unnecessary risks when conservative measures fail and surgery is indicated.
    • Prioritizing adequate exposure and complete decompression is crucial for effective lumbar disc surgery.