Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.0K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.0K
Bias01:22

Bias

4.3K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
4.3K
Aggregates Classification01:29

Aggregates Classification

328
Aggregate classification is generally based on its size, petrographic characteristics, weight, and source. Size classification ranges from coarse to fine aggregates, defined by the size of the particles. Coarse aggregates are particles that do not pass through ASTM sieve No. 4, and aggregates that pass through the sieve are fine aggregates.
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
328
Stratified Sampling Method01:16

Stratified Sampling Method

12.1K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
12.1K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.3K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Decision tree-based approach to robust Parkinson's disease subtyping using clinical data of the Michael J. Fox Foundation LRRK2 cross-sectional study.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2025
Same author

The Effects of Gender Signals and Performance in Online Product Reviews.

Frontiers in big data·2022
Same author

Unsupervised ranking of clustering algorithms by INFOMAX.

PloS one·2020
Same author

Classifying and Summarizing Information from Microblogs During Epidemics.

Information systems frontiers : a journal of research and innovation·2020
Same author

Epidemic spreading through direct and indirect interactions.

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2014
Same author

Intergroup networks as random threshold graphs.

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2014
Same journal

Turbulent flow in a vortex separator with a directed pipe inlet.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Systematic characteristic evaluation of clay-based cementitious material derived from calcium carbide residue and waste tile powder.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Retraction Note: Improvement of a rapid diagnostic application of monoclonal antibodies against avian influenza H7 subtype virus using Europium nanoparticles.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Applying large language models to spam detection in the Kazakh low-resource language setting.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

An open-source 3D printing system enabling in-situ freeze-thaw processing of hydrogels.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

An enhanced EfficientNet framework for automated waste classification using cosine annealing and label smoothing.

Scientific reports·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.4K

Ensuring generalized fairness in batch classification.

Manjish Pal1, Subham Pokhriyal2, Sandipan Sikdar3

  • 1Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IIT-Kharagpur, Kharagpur, 721302, India.

Scientific Reports
|November 3, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new framework for fair batch classification, allowing regulated acceptance rates for different groups. The method improves performance and speed across real-world datasets.

More Related Videos

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.5K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

241

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.4K
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.5K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

241

Area of Science:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Machine Learning
  • Algorithmic Fairness

Background:

  • Batch classification selects groups, unlike individual classification, with unique fairness needs.
  • Existing fairness methods fail when different acceptance rates per group are required.
  • Sensitive attributes like gender or race necessitate group-specific fairness considerations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel framework for regulated fairness in batch classification.
  • To address limitations of existing methods in scenarios requiring differential group acceptance rates.
  • To introduce a flexible and efficient post-processing approach for fairness.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a configuration model to regulate group acceptance rates.
  • Introduced a batch-wise fairness post-processing framework using classifier confidence scores.
  • Tested the framework on four real-world datasets with demographic parity and equalized odds.

Main Results:

  • Achieved consistent performance improvements over baseline methods.
  • Demonstrated flexibility in handling multiple overlapping sensitive attributes.
  • Showcased significant speed-up compared to existing approaches.
  • Applied successfully to fair gerrymandering, improving the fairness-accuracy trade-off.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed framework offers a novel and effective solution for fairness in batch classification.
  • It provides regulatory flexibility and computational efficiency, outperforming existing methods.
  • The framework's generalizability is shown through applications beyond standard classification tasks.