Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
Published on: September 20, 2018
A Risk-Based Approach for Safety Case Follow-up of Adverse Event Reports in Pharmacovigilance
Ganesh Kumar Vemula1, Pavan Badale2, Petros Mavrogenis3
1Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Development, Novartis Pharma AG, Hyderabad, India. ganesh_kumar.vemula@novartis.com.
This study analyzed adverse event (AE) report follow-up by Marketing Authorization Holders (MAH), examining a risk-based approach for Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) before the pandemic. Findings offer insights for optimizing safety data collection and regulatory discussions.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacovigilance and Drug Safety
- Regulatory Science
- Health Data Analysis
Background:
- Marketing Authorization Holders (MAHs) manage adverse event (AE) reporting, including Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs).
- Current follow-up strategies for ICSRs are often resource-intensive.
- A risk-based approach to ICSR follow-up is proposed to enhance efficiency and effectiveness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the characteristics and outcomes of follow-up attempts for AE reports.
- To evaluate the application of a risk-based approach to ICSR follow-up by MAHs.
- To provide data supporting industry and regulatory dialogue on ICSR follow-up procedures.
Main Methods:
- Descriptive statistical analysis of ICSR data from the European Economic Area (EEA) pre-pandemic.
- Examination of follow-up response rates over one year.
- Comparison of case types including Spontaneous Reports (SRs), Patient Support Programs (PSPs), and literature, across various ICSR features (e.g., serious, listed, suspected) and product categories (innovator, biological, generics, combinations).
Main Results:
- Analysis of response rates for different types of ICSRs (SR, PSP, literature) and case classifications (serious/non-serious, listed/unlisted, suspected/not-suspected).
- Comparative insights into follow-up effectiveness across innovator, biological, generic, and combination products.
- Characterization of follow-up attempts within a pre-pandemic European Economic Area (EEA) context.
Conclusions:
- The study provides empirical data on the effectiveness of different ICSR follow-up strategies.
- Findings highlight variations in follow-up success based on report source and case characteristics.
- The results aim to inform the development and adoption of more targeted, risk-based ICSR follow-up processes by MAHs and regulatory bodies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report
Purposes:
In the healthcare industry, reports play a crucial role in documenting incidents within an agency. The primary objective of these reports is to ensure patient safety, uphold the...
Drug Regulation
Preclinical Development: Overview

