Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
The Field's mass shooting: emergency medical services response
Peter Martin Hansen1,2,3, Søren Mikkelsen4,5,6, Henrik Alstrøm7,8
1The Mobile Emergency Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Odense University Hospital Svendborg, Svendborg, Denmark. peter.martin.hansen@rsyd.dk.
Background:
Major incidents (MI) happen infrequently in Scandinavia and mass shootings are even less frequently occurring. Case reports and research are called for, as literature is scarce. On 3rd July 2022, a mass shooting took place at the shopping mall Field's in Copenhagen, Denmark. Three people were killed and seven injured by a gunman, firing a rifle inside the mall. A further 21 people suffered minor injuries during the evacuation of the mall. In this case report, we describe the emergency medical services (EMS) incident response and evaluate the EMS´ adherence to the MI management guidelines to identify possible areas of improvement.
Case Presentation:
Forty-eight EMS units including five Tactical Emergency Medical Service teams were dispatched to the incident. Four critically injured patients were taken to two trauma hospitals. The deceased patients were declared dead at the scene and remained there for the sake of the investigation. A total of 24 patients with less severe and minor injuries were treated at four different hospitals in connection with the attack. The ambulance resources were inherently limited in the initial phase of the MI, mandating improvisation in medical incident command. Though challenged, Command and Control, Safety, Communication, Assessment, Triage, Treatment, Transport (CSCATTT) principles were followed.
Conclusions:
The EMS response generally adhered to national guidelines for MI. The activation of EMS and the hospital preparedness program was relevant. Important findings were communication shortcomings; inherent lack of readily available ambulance resources in the initial critical phase; uncertainty regarding the number of perpetrators; uncertainty regarding number of casualties and social media rumors that unnecessarily hampered and prolonged the response. The incident command had to use non-standard measures to mitigate potential challenges.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Introduction Cardiac Emergencies
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Allergic Reactions
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...

