Evaluation of the effect of pelvis type in percutaneous acetabular column fixation: a computed tomography study

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of pelvis type in percutaneous acetabular column fixation. What is the effect of pelvis type in percutaneous acetabular colon fixation? The available pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans which were obtained in the diagnostic imaging center with a 1 mm slice width were evaluated. The pelvic type was classified with the help of MPR (Multiplanar Reformat) and 3D (Three Dimensional) imaging modes. All evaluated bony pelvic structures were anatomically intact. 40 types of android, gynecoid, anthropoid, and platypelloid pelvis were determined. CT sections were created in MPR imaging mode. Anterior obturator oblique (AOO) and inlet images were created for anterior column evaluation, while iliac oblique (IO) and outlet images were created for posterior column evaluation. The possibility of obtaining a linear corridor for acetabular columns was investigated by measuring corridor width and lengthon images of pelvic CTs. A linear corridor could not be obtained between the pubic tubercle and the supraacetabular region of 12 (30%) CTs in the anterior column of gynecoid pelvis group. The diameter of the anterior column corridor was below 5.5 mm in 10 (25%) of Gynecoid pelvis group, 5 (12.5%) of Anthropoid pelvis group, and 10 of Platypelloid pelvis group, , and all those scans belonged to the female gender. There was a statistically significant difference between pelvis types in terms of anterior and posterior column diameters (p <0.001). While the android pelvis type had the highest diameter and corridor length in both anterior column and posterior column measurements, the gynecoid pelvic type had the lowest diameter and corridor length. In the evaluations made according to gender, both anterior and posterior column diameters were larger and longer in males than in females (p <0.001). Pelvis type is an important factor which can affect anterior and posterior column diameter and length of acetabulum. Pelvic typing before acetabular surgery can help the surgeon determining the most appropriate patient position, surgical approach, and implant selection. Level of Evidence: Level 2.