Evaluation of handheld Raman spectrometers for the detection of intact explosives

The detection of intact explosives in the field provides a unique challenge for investigators, considering the sensitive and dangerous nature of these samples. Handheld Raman instruments have grown in popularity for the analysis of unknown samples in the field, combining speed of data collection and reliability with a size that allows for the instruments to be field portable. Handheld Raman instruments are used commonly in the field, and yet there is very little research on the detection capabilities of these instruments, specifically for explosive compounds. The present study aimed to evaluate the detection capabilities of two handheld Raman spectrometers, the Rigaku ResQ-CQL and the Field Forensics HandyRam™, using explosives analytical standards, including 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT), nitromethane (NM), ammonium nitrate (AN) and smokeless powder components such as diphenylamine (DPA), ethyl centralite (EC), and methyl centralite (MC). The spectrometers were evaluated on their sensitivity, the repeatability of the data, and the performance of the internal library when available. In addition, an interference study with glass and plastic containers was also performed. Finally, authentic intact explosive samples, including TNT flakes, a mixture of ammonium nitrate and fuel oil (ANFO), smokeless powder and nitromethane were analyzed to evaluate the developed method and test the detection capabilities of the spectrometers with authentic samples. Spectra were reproducible for all the analytes across both instruments, with regards to the peak location and the intensity. Spectra obtained with the Rigaku ResQ-CQL displayed better resolution for all analytes, including the authentic samples. In addition, its wider scan range allowed for the detection of more detailed peaks below 400 cm^-1. Identifying the detection capabilities of these handheld instruments can therefore help guide investigators on how to best utilize them in the field.