Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Impact of temporal and spatial resolution on atrial feature tracking cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
Jonas Schmidt-Rimpler1, Sören J Backhaus2, Finn P Hartmann3
1University Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany; University Medical Center Göttingen, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany.
Background:
Myocardial deformation assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance-feature tracking (CMR-FT) has incremental prognostic value over volumetric analyses. Recently, atrial functional analyses have come to the fore. However, to date recommendations for optimal resolution parameters for accurate atrial functional analyses are still lacking.
Methods:
CMR-FT was performed in 12 healthy volunteers and 9 ischemic heart failure (HF) patients. Cine sequences were acquired using different temporal (20, 30, 40 and 50 frames/cardiac cycle) and spatial resolution parameters (high 1.5 × 1.5 mm in plane and 5 mm slice thickness, standard 1.8 × 1.8 × 8 mm and low 3.0 × 3.0 × 10 mm). Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility were calculated.
Results:
Increasing temporal resolution is associated with higher absolute strain and strain rate (SR) values. Significant changes in strain assessment for left atrial (LA) total strain occurred between 20 and 30 frames/cycle amounting to 2,5-4,4% in absolute changes depending on spatial resolution settings. From 30 frames/cycle onward, absolute strain values remained unchanged. Significant changes of LA strain rate assessment were observed up to the highest temporal resolution of 50 frames/cycle. Effects of spatial resolution on strain assessment were smaller. For LA total strain a general trend emerged for a mild decrease in strain values obtained comparing the lowest to the highest spatial resolution at temporal resolutions of 20, 40 and 50 frames/cycle (p = 0.006-0.046) but not at 30 frames/cycle (p = 0.140).
Conclusion:
Temporal and to a smaller extent spatial resolution affect atrial functional assessment. Consistent strain assessment requires a standard spatial resolution and a temporal resolution of 30 frames/cycle, whilst SR assessment requires even higher settings of at least 50 frames/cycle.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI

