Call it as it is - Why medical education should reconsider disease eponyms

Medical disease names should be reflective of the pathophysiologic processes underlying them. Medical education has propagated the use of outdated eponyms when referring to diseases named after individuals who discovered or described the diseases in question. This is confusing and harmful to medical students learning about these diseases and can present a seemingly insurmountable barrier to understanding complex pathologies. The renaming of diseases that are colloquially referred to by individuals' names is proposed. Medical schools are encouraged to adopt this nomenclature so that students will effectively understand pathophysiology and eventually provide optimal patient care. While it is not feasible to be completely systematic in this approach, striving for this change will enable a spotlight to shine on the disease and not the individuals who popularized the condition. Numerous examples are given of diseases that are either appropriately or inappropriately named, with recommendations for renaming given where applicable. An exploration of the benefits and disadvantages of renaming includes both historical and modern contexts for making the change.