Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2026

A Detailed Protocol for Physiological Parameters Acquisition and Analysis in Neurosurgical Critical Patients
Published on: October 17, 2017
Improved Transcranial Doppler Waveform Analysis for Intracranial Hypertension Assessment in Patients with Traumatic
Sérgio Brasil1, Hannah Romeijn2, Esther K Haspels2
1Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar 255, São Paulo, Brazil. sbrasil@usp.br.
The pulsatile apparent resistance (PaR) index, a novel transcranial Doppler measurement, shows superior ability in detecting intracranial hypertension compared to the traditional pulsatility index (PI) in traumatic brain injury patients.
Area of Science:
- Neurocritical Care
- Cerebrovascular Physiology
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Transcranial Doppler (TCD) is a noninvasive tool for assessing cerebral hemodynamics, calculating the pulsatility index (PI) correlated with intracranial pressure (ICP).
- Traditional PI has limitations in predicting raised ICP due to confounding factors.
- The pulsatile apparent resistance (PaR) index was developed to correct PI for arterial blood pressure, aiming to reduce confounding influences.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the predictive value of the PaR index versus the PI for detecting intracranial hypertension (IH) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).
- To evaluate the diagnostic performance of PaR and PI in identifying IH (ICP > 20 mm Hg).
Main Methods:
- Prospective study including TBI patients requiring invasive ICP monitoring in a neurocritical care unit.
- TCD measurements of middle cerebral arteries were performed to calculate PI and PaR.
- Area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) was used to assess discriminative power for IH (ICP ≥ 20 mm Hg).
Main Results:
- PaR demonstrated a higher discriminative power (AUC 0.77) for IH compared to PI (AUC 0.63) in 93 TBI patients.
- PaR showed a significant difference between patients with and without IH (median 0.169 vs. -0.052, p=0.001).
- Excluding patients who underwent neurosurgery further improved PaR's discriminative power (AUC 0.89), with a cutoff of -0.023 yielding 100% sensitivity.
Conclusions:
- The PaR index is a superior noninvasive parameter for discriminating intracranial hypertension in TBI patients compared to PI.
- PaR shows promise as a reliable noninvasive tool for IH detection.
- Further research is needed to establish clinical applications for PaR in neurosurgical decision-making and patient management.
Related Concept Videos
Increased Intracranial Pressure l: Introduction
Increased Intracranial Pressure ll: Pathophysiology

