Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Improved Renal Denervation Mitigated Hypertension Induced by Angiotensin II Infusion
Published on: May 26, 2022
The Efficacy of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor Versus Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or
Sohny Kotak1, Warda Hassan1, Marium Mehmood1
1Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK.
Insights
Sacubitril/valsartan shows benefits in reducing major adverse cardiac events and rehospitalizations post-myocardial infarction (MI) compared to ACE inhibitors. While not impacting mortality, it offers advantages over ACE inhibitors and ARBs for heart failure risk in MI patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Medicine
Background:
- Acute myocardial infarction (MI) is a critical global health issue with high mortality.
- Current treatments include angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs).
- Sacubitril/valsartan is a newer therapeutic option for heart failure management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan versus ACEIs/ARBs in post-MI patients.
- To evaluate the impact on heart failure risk and other cardiovascular outcomes.
- To provide evidence-based guidelines for sacubitril/valsartan use post-MI.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was performed on English databases.
- Eight clinical trials involving adult patients with recent acute MI were included.
- Pooled analysis was conducted using Review Manager software, analyzing dichotomous variables.
Main Results:
- Sacubitril/valsartan increased hypotension risk compared to ACEIs (RR: 1.29).
- It significantly improved left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) versus ACEIs (RR: 3.08).
- No significant differences were found in mortality or heart failure risk compared to ACEIs. However, it reduced major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and rehospitalizations (RR: 0.64 and 0.53, respectively).
- Compared to ARBs, sacubitril/valsartan significantly decreased NT-proBNP levels but showed no difference in LVEF improvement.
Conclusions:
- Sacubitril/valsartan demonstrates significant benefits in reducing MACE and rehospitalizations post-MI compared to ACEIs.
- It offers advantages in improving LVEF and reducing NT-proBNP when compared to ACEIs and ARBs.
- While not altering mortality rates, sacubitril/valsartan is a beneficial therapeutic option for post-MI patients, particularly for managing heart failure risk.
Abstract:
Acute myocardial infarction (MI) is one of the leading global healthcare emergencies, contributing to over three million global deaths. The purpose of this study is to investigate further the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan over angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in reducing the risk of heart failure (HF) in post-MI patients and providing a clear evidence-based medicine guideline for future use. An electronic database search was conducted on English databases. Eight articles were included, fulfilling our inclusion criteria, i.e., adult patients of ≥18 years with a recent diagnosis of acute MI. Pooled analysis was done using Review Manager version 5.4.1 (Cochrane Collaboration, London, England), and the data for each outcome were analyzed as dichotomous variables. A total of eight clinical trials were included in the meta-analysis. Six studies analyzed the sacubitril/valsartan and ACEI combination. The pooled analysis reported a significant increase in the risk of hypotension (relative risk {RR}: 1.29 {1.18, 1.41}) in the sacubitril/valsartan compared to the ACEI alone group. In addition, a significant increase was observed in the left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) after using the sacubitril/valsartan combination compared to using ACEI alone (RR: 3.08 {2.68, 4.48}). Furthermore, no significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of mortality rate (RR: 0.86 {0.73, 1.02}), the risk of heart failure (RR: 0.62 {0.39, 1.00}), the frequency of recurrent MI (RR: 0.86 {0.27, 2.76}), and the mean difference of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (weighted mean difference {WMD}: -174.36 {-414.18, 65.46}) between both the groups. However, the sacubitril/valsartan combination proved to be beneficial in significantly reducing the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (RR: 0.64 {0.48, 0.84}) and rehospitalizations (RR: 0.53 {0.39, 0.71}) as compared to ACEI post MI. Additionally, sacubitril/valsartan and ARB's combination was reported in two studies. This led to a significant decrease in NT-proBNP concentration (WMD: -71.91 {-138.43, -5.39}) post MI in the sacubitril/valsartan combination group compared to the ARB usage alone. However, no significant difference was observed in the improvement of LVEF (WMD: 0.88 {-5.11, 6.87}) between both groups. Although the sacubitril/valsartan combination has no difference in mortality and outcomes compared to ACEI, there is evidence that using it proves to be more beneficial post MI compared to ACEI and ARB usage alone.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Antihypertensive Drugs: Direct Renin Inhibitors
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Antianginal Drugs: Nitrates and β-Blockers
Organic nitrates, such as nitroglycerin, play a pivotal role. Once metabolized, they liberate nitric oxide, a molecular marvel. Nitric oxide triggers guanylyl cyclase and augments cGMP production. This biochemical cascade orchestrates the relaxation of vascular smooth muscles, ushering in vasodilation and enhancing coronary blood flow....

