Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Controlled-Potential Coulometry: Electrolytic Methods01:17

Controlled-Potential Coulometry: Electrolytic Methods

177
Controlled-potential coulometry, also known as potentiostatic coulometry, employs a three-electrode system in which the working electrode's potential is precisely regulated using a potentiostat. Platinum working electrodes are utilized for positive potentials, while mercury pool electrodes are favored for extremely negative potentials. The platinum counter electrode is separated from the analyte using a membrane or salt bridge to avoid interference in the analysis.
The chosen potential...
177
Controlled-Current Coulometry: Overview01:27

Controlled-Current Coulometry: Overview

212
Controlled current coulometry, also known as amperostatic coulometry, is a technique used in electrochemical analysis to measure the quantity of a substance through the controlled passage of current. It involves the application of a constant current to an electrochemical cell containing the analyte of interest. As the current flows through the cell, the analyte undergoes a redox reaction at the electrode surface, resulting in a charge transfer. By monitoring the time required for a certain...
212
Interfacial Electrochemical Methods: Overview01:06

Interfacial Electrochemical Methods: Overview

256
Interfacial electrochemical methods focus on the phenomena occurring at the boundary between an electrode and a solution, as opposed to bulk methods that concentrate on the solution's overall properties. These interfacial methods are classified as either static or dynamic based on the presence of a nonzero current in the electrochemical cell and the consistency of analyte concentrations. Static methods, such as potentiometry, measure the cell's potential without any significant current...
256
Coulometry: Overview01:00

Coulometry: Overview

1.5K
Coulometry is one of the rapid, most accurate, and precise analytical techniques that determine the quantity of an analyte by measuring the electrical charge needed for its complete electrolysis without using any analytical standards. The total charge passed during electrolysis correlates with the analyte amount by Faraday's laws of electrolysis. For accurate coulometric measurements, a charge equal to Faraday's constant multiplied by the number of electrons involved in the relevant...
1.5K
Controlled-Current Coulometry: Coulometric Titration01:18

Controlled-Current Coulometry: Coulometric Titration

184
Coulometric titrations are a form of titrimetric analysis where the reagent is generated electrically, and its amount is evaluated based on current and generating time. The electron serves as the standard reagent. The procedure is similar to conventional titrations, such as endpoint detection.
The fundamental requirements for coulometric titrations are (1) 100% efficiency in the reagent-generating electrode reaction and (2) a stoichiometric and preferably rapid reaction between the generated...
184
Electrogravimetric Analysis: Overview01:30

Electrogravimetric Analysis: Overview

244
Electrogravimetric analysis measures the weight of an analyte deposited electrolytically onto a suitable working electrode. This method involves applying a potential to a pre-weighed electrode submerged in a solution, which results in the desired substance being deposited through reduction at the cathode or oxidation at the anode. The electrode's weight is recorded after deposition, and the difference in weight gives the analyte's weight in the solution.
To test the completeness of the...
244

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Integrating Charge Equilibration with Equivariant Machine-Learning Interatomic Potentials.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same author

Erasing dielectric breakdown artifacts to machine-learn charged Pt-water interfaces.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

Kinetic restructuring of catalyst active sites: a MACE-APE study of fluxional Pd<sub><i>n</i></sub>/MgO (<i>n</i> = 3-11) clusters.

Faraday discussions·2026
Same author

DSKO: Dancing through DFTB Parametrization.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same author

Simulating quadrupolar NMR dynamics in solid electrolyte Li10GeP2S12.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

Interplay between shape and composition in bimetallic nanoparticles revealed by an efficient optimal-exchange optimization algorithm.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Electric-field Control of Electronic States in WS2 Nanodevices by Electrolyte Gating
10:36

Electric-field Control of Electronic States in WS2 Nanodevices by Electrolyte Gating

Published on: April 12, 2018

11.5K

Controlled Electrochemical Barrier Calculations without Potential Control.

Simeon D Beinlich1,2, Georg Kastlunger3, Karsten Reuter1

  • 1Fritz-Haber-Institut der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Faradayweg 4-6, 14195 Berlin, Germany.

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
|November 7, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Understanding electrochemical activation energies is key for catalysis. New methods compute these barriers accurately without a potentiostat, using Legendre transforms for efficiency and improved accuracy by including geometric factors.

More Related Videos

Precise Electrochemical Sizing of Individual Electro-Inactive Particles
05:03

Precise Electrochemical Sizing of Individual Electro-Inactive Particles

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.3K
Characterizing Electron Transport through Living Biofilms
08:52

Characterizing Electron Transport through Living Biofilms

Published on: June 1, 2018

8.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Electric-field Control of Electronic States in WS2 Nanodevices by Electrolyte Gating
10:36

Electric-field Control of Electronic States in WS2 Nanodevices by Electrolyte Gating

Published on: April 12, 2018

11.5K
Precise Electrochemical Sizing of Individual Electro-Inactive Particles
05:03

Precise Electrochemical Sizing of Individual Electro-Inactive Particles

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.3K
Characterizing Electron Transport through Living Biofilms
08:52

Characterizing Electron Transport through Living Biofilms

Published on: June 1, 2018

8.4K

Area of Science:

  • Electrochemistry
  • Computational Chemistry
  • Materials Science

Background:

  • Electrochemical activation energies are crucial for understanding catalytic activity at interfaces.
  • Accurate computation of these energies under applied potentials is challenging with existing methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop novel computational methods for determining electrochemical activation energies.
  • To achieve accuracy comparable to constant potential grand canonical approaches without explicit potentiostat use.

Main Methods:

  • Employing Legendre transforms of constant charge, canonical reaction paths.
  • Introducing straightforward approximations to reduce computational cost and complexity.
  • Analytically including geometric response alongside electronic degrees of freedom.

Main Results:

  • Developed a new computational approach for electrochemical barriers.
  • Achieved accuracy comparable to established methods.
  • Demonstrated significant reduction in computational cost and complexity.
  • Highlighted the importance of geometric factors in barrier evaluation.

Conclusions:

  • The new Legendre transform-based methods provide an efficient and accurate way to compute electrochemical barriers.
  • These methods simplify the process by removing the need for a potentiostat.
  • Incorporating both electronic and geometric responses is vital for accurate electrochemical barrier calculations.