Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Bone Marrow Transplantation Platform to Investigate the Role of Dendritic Cells in Graft-versus-Host Disease
Published on: March 17, 2020
Explorations of post-gDLI low-dose cyclophosphamide for preventing severe aGVHD
Xin Chen1, Xinhui Zheng1, Ni Lu1
1State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300020, China; Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin 301600, China.
Objective:
Relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a serious life-threatening complication. The granulocyte colony-stimulated factor mobilized donor lymphocyte infusions (gDLI) combined with chemotherapy is currently a commonly used treatment method. Nevertheless, gDLI may cause so severe acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) as to impact prognosis. Posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has been the backbone for GVHD prophylaxis by inducing tolerance to minor histocompatibility antigens in recipients, while the application of post-gDLI low-dose cyclophosphamide (PDCy) for GVHD prophylaxis has not yet been attempted.
Methods:
To explore this possibility, a retrospective study was conducted. 20 patients relapsing after HSCT were administered 20 mg/kg/d cyclophosphamide(Cy)on day 3 (for matched related transplantation) or on days 3 and 4 (for haplo-identical or unrelated transplantation) after gDLI to prevent aGVHD (the PDCy group). Furthermore, through propensity score matching, 58 matched controls received other (for HID and URD) or no (for MSD) immunosuppressive therapy for GVHD prophylaxis (the Non-Cy group).
Results:
With a median follow-up of 4.8 (0-37.1) months, the PDCy group had lower cumulative incidence of severe aGVHD (III-IV, 5 % vs 31 %, p = 0.02; II-IV, 25 % vs 52 %, p = 0.04), but no significant differences existed in 4-month OS (64 % vs 59 %, p = 0.51), 4-month CIR (20 % vs 47 %, p = 0.11), rates of objective response (68.8 % vs 54.5 %, p = 0.6) (hematological or extramedullary relapse), MRD complete response (25 % vs 42 % p = 1) and MRD response (25 % vs 50 %, p = 0.6) (molecular relapse) between the PDCy group and the Non-Cy group. The PDCy regimen didn't increase the incidence of adverse infection, hemorrhagic cystitis, and cardiac events.
Conclusion:
On the premise of safety, the PDCy regimen could effectively protest against severe aGVHD after gDLI while preserving therapeutic response rates. However, the research results still require verification through longer follow-up and large prospective randomized studies.
More Related Videos
11:55Induction of Alloantigen-specific Anergy in Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells by Alloantigen Stimulation with Co-stimulatory Signal Blockade
Published on: March 14, 2011
06:06Induction and Scoring of Graft-Versus-Host Disease in a Xenogeneic Murine Model and Quantification of Human T Cells in Mouse Tissues using Digital PCR
Published on: May 23, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Bone Marrow Sampling and Transplants
The transplant begins with high doses of chemotherapy and radiation treatment, which aim to destroy...
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Cell-mediated Immune Responses
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Glucocorticoids
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Immunodeficiency Diseases
There are three main causes of immunodeficiency...