Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 27, 2026

13:41
Use of Interferon-γ Enzyme-linked Immunospot Assay to Characterize Novel T-cell Epitopes of Human Papillomavirus
Published on: March 8, 2012
12.5K
Self-Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing: Acceptability in a U.S. Safety Net Health System
Susan L Parker1, Trisha L Amboree1, Shaun Bulsara2
1Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
|November 7, 2023
Summary
Self-sampling kits for human papillomavirus testing are acceptable to underscreened patients, offering a convenient and less embarrassing alternative to provider-performed screening. High acceptability suggests potential for increased cervical cancer screening uptake.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Gynecology
- Infectious Disease
Background:
- Cervical cancer screening access and utilization can be expanded through self-sampling strategies.
- Patient acceptability is crucial for the successful adoption of self-sampling methods.
- Underscreened populations in safety net health systems present a key target for improved screening interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the acceptability and experiences of mailed self-sampling kits for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing.
- To identify barriers to traditional provider-performed cervical cancer screening.
- To evaluate patient experiences with HPV self-sampling kits compared to in-clinic screening.
Main Methods:
- A nested telephone survey was conducted with participants (n=272) from the Prospective Evaluation of Self-Testing to Increase Screening trial.
- Participants were patients aged 30-65 in a safety net health system who were not up-to-date on screening.
- Surveys collected data on barriers to provider-performed screening and experiences with mailed HPV self-sampling kits.
Main Results:
- Prevalent barriers to provider-performed screening included discomfort with pelvic exams (69.4%), male providers (65.4%), and embarrassment (57.0%).
- Among kit users (n=164), 84.8% reported positive experiences, with most finding self-sampling more convenient (89.0%), less embarrassing (99.4%), and less stressful (95.7%).
- Among nonusers (n=43), reasons for non-use included forgetting (76.7%), preference for provider screening (76.7%), and fear of cancer (67.4%).
Conclusions:
- Mailed HPV self-sampling kits were generally well-received by underscreened patients in a safety net setting.
- The increased comfort and reduced embarrassment/anxiety associated with self-sampling address key barriers to traditional screening.
- High acceptability indicates that HPV self-sampling could significantly increase cervical cancer screening rates upon regulatory approval and availability.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Investigation of Disease Outbreaks
Multistate foodborne outbreaks pose significant public health risks and require meticulous investigation to identify sources and implement control measures. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) utilizes a dynamic seven-step process for these investigations, integrating data from laboratories, interviews, and environmental assessments to protect public health.Outbreak Detection: The detection of multistate outbreaks typically begins with PulseNet, the CDC's national laboratory...
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
Automated diagnostic analyzers have transformed clinical microbiology by providing rapid and reliable methods for pathogen identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Among these systems, the Vitek 2 is widely used because it automates the traditionally labor-intensive processes of microbial identification (ID) and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST), delivering standardized and timely results that are essential for effective patient care.Microbial Identification with ID CardsThe...

