Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Isolation of Atrial Cardiomyocytes from a Rat Model of Metabolic Syndrome-related Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: July 26, 2018
Clinical features, etiology, and survival in patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy: A single-center experience
Justyna A Szczygieł1, Piotr Michałek2, Grażyna Truszkowska3
1Department of Cardiomyopathy, National Institute of Cardiology, Warszawa, Poland. j.szczygiel@ikard.pl.
Insights
Genetic testing is crucial for restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) patients without light-chain amyloidosis. Biomarkers like GDF-15, hs-TNT, NT-proBNP, and pericardial effusion predict poor survival in RCM.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Genetics
- Cardiovascular Research
Background:
- Restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) knowledge is limited, unlike cardiac amyloidosis (CA).
- Prognostic factors for RCM require further elucidation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the etiology and prognostic factors of RCM.
- To evaluate cardiac biomarkers (hs-TnT, GDF-15, NT-proBNP, sST2) as mortality predictors in RCM.
- To assess the role of genetic testing in RCM diagnosis.
Main Methods:
- Enrolled 36 RCM patients from a tertiary cardiac department.
- Screened all patients for CA and performed genetic testing on 17 non-CA patients.
- Utilized univariate Cox models, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and log-rank tests for survival analysis.
Main Results:
- Identified pathogenic/likely pathogenic gene variants in 86% of tested RCM patients, including 5 novel variants.
- Median overall survival was 29 months, with 20 deaths and 4 heart transplantations.
- GDF-15, hs-TnT, NT-proBNP, blood pressure, left ventricular stroke volume, E/e' ratio, TAPSE, early diastolic tricuspid annular velocity, pulmonary hypertension, and pericardial effusion significantly impacted survival.
Conclusions:
- Genetic testing is recommended for RCM patients post-light-chain amyloidosis exclusion.
- Survival remains poor for RCM patients irrespective of etiology.
- Elevated GDF-15, hs-TNT, NT-proBNP, and presence of pericardial effusion indicate a worse prognosis.
Background:
Numerous prognostic factors have been proposed for cardiac amyloidosis (CA). The knowledge about other subtypes of restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) is scant.
Aims:
This study aimed to elucidate the etiology and prognostic factors of RCM as well as assess cardiac biomarkers: high-sensitive troponin T (hs-TnT), growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2, as mortality predictors in RCM.
Methods:
We enrolled 36 RCM patients in our tertiary cardiac department. All patients were screened for CA. Genetic testing was performed in 17 patients without CA.
Results:
Pathogenic or likely pathogenic gene variants were found in 86% of patients, including 5 novel variants. Twenty patients died, and 4 had a heart transplantation during the study. Median overall survival was 29 months (8-55). The univariate Cox models analysis indicated that systolic and diastolic blood pressure, GDF-15, hs-TnT, NT-proBNP, left ventricular stroke volume, the ratio of the transmitral early peak velocity (E) estimated by pulsed wave Doppler over the early mitral annulus velocity (e'), tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion, early tricuspid valve annular systolic velocity, the presence of pulmonary hypertension, and pericardial effusion influenced survival (P <0.05). A worse prognosis was observed in patients with GDF-15 >1316 pg/ml, hs-TnT >42 ng/l, NT-proBNP >3383 pg/ml, and pericardial effusion >3.5 mm (Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, P <0.001).
Conclusions:
Genetic testing should be considered in every RCM patient where light-chain amyloidosis has been excluded. Survival remains poor regardless of etiology. Increased concentrations of GDF-15, hs-TNT, NT-proBNP, and pericardial effusion are associated with worse prognosis. Further studies are warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests

