Value of pneumococcal PCR in respiratory samples for exclusion of pneumococcal pneumonia

Sam Van Goethem1,2, Philippe Van Lint3, Philippe Willems3

  • 1Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Pneumococcal PCR using the lytA gene is useful for diagnosing pneumonia. A negative test strongly suggests no pneumococcal infection, but a positive result requires further investigation due to potential non-pathogenic colonization.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Microbiology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Respiratory Medicine

Background:

  • Streptococcus pneumoniae is a primary cause of bacterial pneumonia.
  • Pneumococcal PCR is common in respiratory panels but interpretation is challenging due to colonization and cross-reactivity.
  • The lytA gene is a specific target for S. pneumoniae detection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of lytA gene detection in a respiratory multiplex quantitative PCR (qPCR) panel for diagnosing S. pneumoniae pneumonia.
  • To assess the diagnostic accuracy of lytA qPCR in hospitalized pneumonia patients.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of lytA gene results from respiratory multiplex PCR panels in pneumonia patients.
  • Classification of patients into 'probable', 'possible', or 'unlikely' pneumococcal pneumonia groups.
  • Evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the lytA PCR test.

Main Results:

  • The lytA qPCR demonstrated a sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 89.6%.
  • Negative predictive value was high at 97.6%, while positive predictive value was low at 34.2%.
  • Significant differences in semi-quantitative Ct values were observed between 'probable' and 'possible/unlikely' pneumococcal pneumonia groups.

Conclusions:

  • A negative lytA qPCR result in respiratory samples is highly predictive of the absence of S. pneumoniae.
  • The lytA qPCR test shows a high negative predictive value for pneumococcal pneumonia, aiding in excluding the pathogen.
  • The positive predictive value is limited, necessitating careful interpretation in clinical practice.