Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
Chronologic evolution and prognostic implications of impaired coronary flow after chronic total occlusion angioplasty
You Zhou1,2,3, Jiaqi Ma1,2,3, Zhangwei Chen1,2,3
1Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Insights
Slow flow (SF) after chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is linked to worse outcomes, including periprocedural myocardial infarction and restenosis. Achieving normal coronary flow is crucial for successful CTO revascularization and improved patient prognosis.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Biology
Background:
- Successful recanalization of chronic total occlusion (CTO) vessels can lead to recovery, but the clinical significance of slow flow (SF) phenomenon post-recanalization remains understudied.
- Limited evidence exists regarding the determinants, development, and prognostic impact of SF following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for CTO.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical significance of the slow flow (SF) phenomenon after successful recanalization of chronic total occlusion (CTO) via percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- To identify the independent predictors and prognostic impact of SF on clinical outcomes and target lesion restenosis in patients undergoing CTO PCI.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 500 patients undergoing CTO PCI with follow-up angiography.
- Coronary flow assessed using corrected Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) frame count (CTFC).
- Analysis of clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics to determine SF predictors and outcomes.
Main Results:
- Slow flow (SF) was observed in 5.8% of patients post-CTO PCI.
- Independent predictors of SF included prior myocardial infarction, right coronary artery (RCA) revascularization, and lack of bilateral collaterals.
- SF was associated with increased risks of periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) and target lesion restenosis.
- In patients with baseline LVEF ≤60%, systolic improvement was compromised in the SF group compared to the normal flow group.
Conclusions:
- The slow flow (SF) phenomenon significantly influences the prognosis of patients undergoing CTO PCI.
- Achieving normal coronary flow during CTO revascularization is essential for optimal patient outcomes.
- Further research into managing SF post-CTO PCI may improve long-term results.
Background:
Although vessels have the potential to recover following successful recanalization of chronic total occlusion (CTO), evidence is limited about the clinical significance of slow flow (SF) phenomenon after recanalization. The aim of this study was to evaluate the determinants, development and prognostic impact of SF after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for CTO.
Methods:
This was a retrospective cohort study, 500 patients were consecutively enrolled undergoing CTO PCI and consecutive follow-up angiography in Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, between 2015 and 2020. Coronary flow was assessed by corrected Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) frame count (CTFC). The association between SF and outcomes of CTO PCI was evaluated by analyzing the clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics.
Results:
SF was observed in 29 (5.8%) patients immediately after CTO PCI. Prior myocardial infraction, right coronary artery (RCA) revascularization and lack of bilateral collaterals were independent predictors of SF. SF was associated with increased risks of periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) [adjusted odds ratio (adOR): 4.12; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.68-10.07; P=0.002] and target lesion restenosis (adOR: 2.50; 95% CI: 1.10-5.72; P=0.030). In patients with baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤60%, systolic improvement was compromised in the SF group (LVEF: 55.4%±9.6% in follow up vs. 52.1%±9.4% before CTO PCI, P=0.147) compared with that of the normal group (LVEF: 55.7%±9.3% vs. 51.6%±8.5%, P<0.001).
Conclusions:
SF has a significant influence on the prognosis of patients undergoing CTO PCI. Achieving normal coronary flow is essential in CTO revascularization.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction

