Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

06:11
Author Spotlight: Advancing Anaerobic Microbiota Research Using a Novel Respirometry Protocol
Published on: April 26, 2024
1.3K
Assessment of Municipal Solid-Waste Landfill Liner Performance
Pradeep Jain1, Kevin M Winslow1, Timothy G Townsend2
1Innovative Waste Consulting Services, LLC, 3720 NW 43rd St., Suite 103, Gainesville, FL 32606.
Summary
Municipal solid-waste landfill liner systems demonstrate over 98% efficiency in collecting leachate. Both composite and geomembrane liners perform similarly, though the HELP model may inaccurately estimate leakage rates.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Engineering
- Geotechnical Engineering
- Waste Management
Background:
- Landfill liner systems are critical for environmental protection, preventing leachate contamination.
- Performance assessment of primary liner systems in municipal solid-waste landfills is essential for regulatory compliance and environmental safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance and efficiency of primary liner systems in municipal solid-waste landfills using leachate collection system (LCS) and leak detection system (LDS) data.
- To compare the actual leakage rates with estimations from the Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) model.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of flow rate data from LCS and LDS across 54 landfills in seven US states with double-liner systems.
- Calculation of aggregated liner system efficiency based on collected leachate volumes.
- Comparison of observed leakage rates with HELP model predictions for different liner types (composite vs. geomembrane).
Main Results:
- The aggregated efficiency of primary liner systems was found to be over 98%, assuming complete leachate collection.
- No statistically significant difference in collection efficiency was observed between composite liners and geomembrane-only liners (median of 99% for both).
- The HELP model tends to overestimate leakage for geomembrane liners but underestimate it for composite liners, given default defect parameters.
Conclusions:
- Primary liner systems in municipal solid-waste landfills exhibit high collection efficiency.
- Composite and geomembrane-only primary liners demonstrate comparable performance in terms of leachate collection efficiency.
- The HELP model's leakage estimation equations may require recalibration for accurate prediction of liner performance, considering potential groundwater intrusion into the LDS.
Related Concept Videos
Testing Water Quality
117
When the quality of water for concrete preparation is uncertain, its impact on the setting time of cement and compressive strength of mortar is assessed by comparison with de-ionized or distilled water benchmarks. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) C1602 requires the setting times to be within 90 minutes of the control, British Standard (BS) 3146:1980 allows a 30-minute variance in the initial setting, while British Standards European Norm (BS EN) 1008 specifies initial setting...
117
Deleterious Substances in Aggregate
172
Deleterious substances in aggregates can be detrimental to the quality and durability of concrete. These substances include organic impurities like loam, which interfere with cement hydration and are usually present in the sand. These prevent a good bond between aggregate and cement paste. Organic impurities can be detected using the colorimetric test, where the darkness of a solution after agitation indicates the level of organic content.
Another type of impurity is clay and fine material that...
Another type of impurity is clay and fine material that...
172

