Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
Extended interval dosing of ocrelizumab in patients with multiple sclerosis is not associated with meaningful
Nicole Bou Rjeily1, Kathryn C Fitzgerald1, Ellen M Mowry1
1Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract:
Risk concerns related to ocrelizumab treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) during the COVID-19 pandemic caused infusion delays with extended interval dosing (EID). We reviewed medical records of patients on ocrelizumab to determine whether EID maintains its effectiveness compared to standard interval dosing (SID). Among 361 patients, 231 (64%) and 123 (34%) had at least one infusion with infusion intervals of ⩾8 months and ⩾12 months, respectively. There were no differences in demographics or clinical profiles between the SID and EID groups. No significant differences between rates of breakthrough activity among relapsing-remitting patients were observed between SID (three patients) and EID (seven patients).
Insights
Extended interval dosing (EID) of ocrelizumab for multiple sclerosis (MS) appears effective, even with longer infusion intervals up to 12 months. This approach maintained treatment efficacy during pandemic-related delays.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Immunology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- The COVID-19 pandemic prompted delays in ocrelizumab infusions for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, leading to the adoption of extended interval dosing (EID).
- Concerns arose regarding the efficacy of EID compared to standard interval dosing (SID) in maintaining disease control.
Approach:
- A retrospective review of medical records for 361 patients treated with ocrelizumab was conducted.
- Patients were categorized into SID and EID groups based on infusion intervals (⩾8 months or ⩾12 months for EID).
- Demographics, clinical profiles, and rates of breakthrough disease activity were compared between groups.
Key Points:
- 64% of patients received at least one infusion with intervals of ⩾8 months, and 34% had intervals of ⩾12 months.
- No significant differences in demographics or clinical characteristics were found between SID and EID groups.
- Breakthrough disease activity rates were similar between patients on SID (3 events) and EID (7 events).
Conclusions:
- Extended interval dosing (EID) of ocrelizumab is a viable strategy for managing multiple sclerosis, particularly during situations necessitating longer infusion schedules.
- EID maintains treatment effectiveness and does not appear to increase the risk of disease activity in relapsing-remitting MS patients compared to standard dosing.
Related Concept Videos
Dosage Regimen: Fixed Dose
Fixed-dose regimens can be used for various routes of administration, including intravenous (IV) injections and oral medications. For IV administration, a predetermined amount of the drug is...
Rational Dosage Regimen: Maintenance Dose and Loading Dose
In most cases, drugs are administered repetitively or infused continuously to maintain a steady-state concentration in the body. At a steady...
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Drug Dosage Regimen: Overview
Typically, the starting dose and dosing interval are guided by the manufacturer's recommendations based on clinical trials conducted during and after drug...
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Glucocorticoids
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF

