Spatiotemporal dynamics of a multi-delayed prey-predator system with variable carrying capacity

Anshu1, Balram Dubey1

  • 1Department of Mathematics, BITS Pilani, Pilani Campus, Pilani 333031, Rajasthan, India.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)
|November 9, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals how delays and carrying capacity influence prey-predator dynamics, leading to complex behaviors like chaos and diverse spatial patterns in ecological systems.

Related Concept Videos

Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
16.3K
Life Histories01:29

Life Histories

Overview
18.0K
Energy Budgets00:51

Energy Budgets

Organisms must balance energy intake with the energy required for growth, maintenance and reproduction. These trade-offs result in a variety of survivorship and reproductive strategies, including semelparity and iteroparity. Semelparous species, like annual plants, have only one reproductive episode in their lifetimes and consequently have short lifespans. Iteroparous species, by contrast, have many reproductive events during their lifetimes but have relatively few offspring. These two...
9.3K
What are Populations and Communities?00:30

What are Populations and Communities?

Overview
33.9K
Speciation Rates01:07

Speciation Rates

Overview
21.2K
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
22.0K