Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

44
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
44
Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models01:21

Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models

89
Mechanistic models, a category encompassing both physiological and compartmental modeling, differ from empirical models' approaches to incorporating known factors about the systems being modeled. Empirical models describe data with minimal assumptions, while mechanistic models aim to provide a robust description of available data by specifying assumptions and integrating known factors about the system. Compartmental analysis is a key example of a mechanistic model in pharmacokinetics and...
89
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.0K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.0K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

57
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
57
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

207
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
207

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Safety and efficacy of tofacitinib for the treatment of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: preliminary results of an open-label, long-term extension study.

Annals of the rheumatic diseases·2024
Same author

One-year outcomes of same-day-discharge robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

BJU international·2024
Same author

Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy with cutaneous ureterostomies: a contemporary multicenter analysis.

World journal of urology·2024
Same author

How can we reduce morbidity after robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal neobladder? A report on postoperative complications by the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group.

BJU international·2024
Same author

Corrigendum to "European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2023 Guidelines" [Eur. Urol. 85 (2024) 17-31].

European urology·2024
Same author

Complications of immuno-oncology care: what urologist should know.

BJU international·2024
Same journal

Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy in the Era of Lesion-focused Sampling.

European urology focus·2026
Same journal

Should Male Pattern Baldness Be Considered in Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

European urology focus·2026
Same journal

A Core Outcome Set for Localized Renal Cell Cancer (L-RCC-COS).

European urology focus·2026
Same journal

Reply to Emre Karabay's Letter to the Editor re: Ritter Manuel, Stein Johannes, Barber Neil, et al. WATER III: A Prospective, Partially Randomized Trial of Aquablation Therapy Versus Transurethral Laser Enucleation of the Prostate for Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. Eur Urol Focus 2026;12:266-74.

European urology focus·2026
Same journal

Radioligand Therapy for Prostate Cancer - A Clinical Consultation Guide.

European urology focus·2026
Same journal

Postoperative Pelvic Lymph Node Radiation Therapy in Lymph Node-Positive Prostate Cancer and Mortality Risk.

European urology focus·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

571

Fixed-effect Versus Random-effects Models for Meta-analyses: Random-effects Models.

Alex L E Halme1, Kristen McAlpine2, Alberto Martini3

  • 1Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

European Urology Focus
|November 9, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Random-effects models are ideal for surgical meta-analyses, effectively managing study variability. They address heterogeneity from patient and population differences, improving analysis reliability.

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

571
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Surgical Research
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Meta-analyses in surgery often face significant heterogeneity.
  • Variability can stem from intrinsic patient or population factors.
  • Standard meta-analysis methods may not adequately address this heterogeneity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the suitability of random-effects models for surgical meta-analyses.
  • To explain how these models account for within-study and between-study variability.
  • To underscore their utility in managing heterogeneity in surgical research.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing random-effects models in statistical meta-analysis.
  • Accounting for both within-study variance and between-study variance.
  • Applying models to datasets with significant heterogeneity in surgical studies.

Main Results:

  • Random-effects models successfully incorporate variability from diverse sources.
  • These models provide a more robust estimate of treatment effects when heterogeneity is present.
  • Demonstrated effectiveness in meta-analyses involving patient and population differences.

Conclusions:

  • Random-effects models are a powerful tool for surgical meta-analysis.
  • They offer a superior approach to handling heterogeneity compared to fixed-effect models.
  • Essential for synthesizing evidence in complex surgical fields.