Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Need for Cognition is associated with a preference for higher task load in effort discounting
Josephine Zerna1, Christoph Scheffel2, Corinna Kührt2
1Chair for Differential and Personality Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg 17, Dresden, 01069, Germany. josephine.zerna@tu-dresden.de.
The new Cognitive and Affective Discounting (CAD) Paradigm quantifies subjective value (SV) of cognitive tasks, accounting for individual effort perception. It reveals that higher Need for Cognition scores correlate with preferring more difficult tasks.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive psychology
- Decision-making research
- Individual differences in motivation
Background:
- Goal-setting involves balancing subjective value (SV) against effort, a key area in psychological research.
- Existing Cognitive Effort Discounting Paradigms assume an inverse relationship between task difficulty and SV, failing to capture individual effort perception differences.
- Traits like Need for Cognition influence how individuals perceive and value effortful cognitive tasks, necessitating a more nuanced approach.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and validate the Cognitive and Affective Discounting (CAD) Paradigm, an adaptation of the Cognitive Effort Discounting Paradigm.
- To quantify subjective values (SVs) of cognitive tasks without assuming a preference for easier tasks.
- To investigate the influence of individual traits, such as Need for Cognition, on effort perception and task SVs.
Main Methods:
- Replication of Westbrook et al. (2013) using the adapted Cognitive and Affective Discounting (CAD) Paradigm with 116 participants.
- Assessment of subjective values (SVs) for varying levels of cognitive task difficulty, allowing for non-linear relationships.
- Measurement of individual Need for Cognition scores and analysis of their impact on SVs and effort perception.
Main Results:
- Many participants preferred more difficult cognitive tasks, challenging the assumption of an inverse difficulty-SV relationship.
- Task accuracy and a declining logistic contrast of n-back levels were significant predictors of SV variance.
- Higher Need for Cognition scores were associated with perceiving higher n-back levels as less effortful and less aversive.
Conclusions:
- The Cognitive and Affective Discounting (CAD) Paradigm effectively assesses task preferences independent of assumed objective difficulty.
- Individual differences, particularly Need for Cognition, significantly modulate the perception of effort and subjective value in cognitive tasks.
- The findings highlight the importance of considering individual traits in understanding effort-based decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Cognitive Dissonance
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Optimal Arousal Theory
Inverted U-Shaped Performance Curve
The...
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
Primary Appraisal:...
Cognitive Learning
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...

