Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Response to "Imaging Data Saves Lives: AI-Enabled Worklist Prioritization as Triage Tool and Learning Engine in Large-Scale Combat Operations".

Military medicine·2026
Same author

Fostering Spiritually Supportive Work Environments in Healthcare: Leadership Recommendations From a Narrative Review.

Journal of nursing management·2026
Same author

Data Saves Lives-The U.S. Military Must Build a Real-Time Combat Casualty Care Data Ecosystem for the Future Battlefield.

Military medicine·2025
Same author

Demonstrating Tactical Combat Casualty Care in Simulated Environments to Enable Passive, Autonomous Documentation: Protocol for a Prospective Simulation-Based Study.

JMIR research protocols·2025
Same author

Experience of The National Emergency Tele-Critical Care Network.

Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association·2025
Same author

Best Practices in Telecritical Care: Expert Consensus Recommendations From the Telecritical Care Collaborative Network.

Critical care medicine·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2026

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills
07:31

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills

Published on: February 13, 2020

7.0K

Developing a Comparative Effective Methodology for Technology Usability During a Simulated Casualty Event.

Patricia M Schmidt1, Holly Ortman1,2, James C Gaudaen1,2

  • 1The US Army Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center, Fort Detrick, MD 21701, USA.

Military Medicine
|November 10, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study developed a simulation method to compare combat casualty care technologies. Medics evaluated devices for usability, informing selection and iterative updates for future battlefield medical readiness.

More Related Videos

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios
06:02

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios

Published on: October 6, 2020

2.3K
Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study
05:43

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study

Published on: November 30, 2022

2.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2026

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills
07:31

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills

Published on: February 13, 2020

7.0K
Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios
06:02

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios

Published on: October 6, 2020

2.3K
Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study
05:43

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study

Published on: November 30, 2022

2.4K

Area of Science:

  • Military Medicine
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Human Factors Engineering

Background:

  • Future combat environments present complex challenges for multi-domain battlefield injuries.
  • Technology integration is crucial for enhancing provider capabilities in combat casualty care.
  • Army experimentation exercises evaluate new concepts and technologies for force integration across all domains.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a method for empirically comparing medical devices for combat casualty care.
  • To prepare for an Army experimentation exercise by evaluating technology through high-fidelity simulation.
  • To incorporate end-user (medic) input for user-centered technology design and rapid improvements.

Main Methods:

  • Six medics participated in high-fidelity simulation scenarios involving medical casualty injuries.
  • Technology devices were evaluated with and without their use during simulated care delivery.
  • Usability data was collected using the System Usability Scale and Adapted Telehealth Usability Questionnaire-Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Command, alongside qualitative feedback.

Main Results:

  • A comparative effectiveness design assessed devices on usability, size, weight, power, cost, connectivity, and cybersecurity.
  • Qualitative feedback provided a holistic assessment of technologies within the combat casualty care scenario.
  • The methodology holistically assessed technologies applied in the combat casualty care scenario.

Conclusions:

  • Results informed decision-makers on technology inclusion for experimentation exercises and proof-of-concept scaling.
  • Developer feedback facilitated iterative updates for devices prior to experimentation.
  • This project contributes empirical medical technology assessments with end-user input, supporting user-centered design for rapid improvements before fielding.