Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
Published on: April 11, 2018
Regional Strain Response of an Anatomically Accurate Human Finite Element Head Model Under Frontal Versus Lateral
Tyler F Rooks1, Valeta Carol Chancey2, Jamie L Baisden1
1Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Introduction:
Because brain regions are responsible for specific functions, regional damage may cause specific, predictable symptoms. However, the existing brain injury criteria focus on whole brain response. This study developed and validated a detailed human brain computational model with sufficient fidelity to include regional components and demonstrate its feasibility to obtain region-specific brain strains under selected loading.
Methods:
Model development used the Simulated Injury Monitor (SIMon) model as a baseline. Each SIMon solid element was split into 8, with each shell element split into 4. Anatomical regions were identified from FreeSurfer fsaverage neuroimaging template. Material properties were obtained from literature. The model was validated against experimental intracranial pressure, brain-skull displacement, and brain strain data. Model simulations used data from laboratory experiments with a rigid arm pendulum striking a helmeted head-neck system. Data from impact tests (6 m/s) at 2 helmet sites (front and left) were used.
Results:
Model validation showed good agreement with intracranial pressure response, fair to good agreement with brain-skull displacement, and good agreement for brain strain. CORrelation Analysis scores were between 0.72 and 0.93 for both maximum principal strain (MPS) and shear strain. For frontal impacts, regional MPS was between 0.14 and 0.36 (average of left and right hemispheres). For lateral impacts, MPS was between 0.20 and 0.48 (left hemisphere) and between 0.22 and 0.51 (right hemisphere). For frontal impacts, regional cumulative strain damage measure (CSDM20) was between 0.01 and 0.87. For lateral impacts, CSDM20 was between 0.36 and 0.99 (left hemisphere) and between 0.09 and 0.93 (right hemisphere).
Conclusions:
Recognizing that neural functions are related to anatomical structures and most model-based injury metrics focus on whole brain response, this study developed an anatomically accurate human brain model to capture regional responses. Model validation was comparable with current models. The model provided sufficient anatomical detail to describe brain regional responses under different impact conditions.
More Related Videos
11:28A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
Published on: May 18, 2015
07:30A Test Bed to Examine Helmet Fit and Retention and Biomechanical Measures of Head and Neck Injury in Simulated Impact
Published on: September 21, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Stress: General Loading Conditions
The shearing force, possessing potential directionality within the plane of the section, is simplified into two component forces running parallel to the x and y axes....
Relation between Poisson's ratio, Modulus of Elasticity and Modulus of Rigidity
Normal Strain under Axial Loading
Eccentric Axial Loading in a Plane of Symmetry
Generalized Hooke's Law
Three-Dimensional Analysis of Strain