Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Development of Temporal Memory for Complex Events.

Developmental science·2026
Same author

Investigating visual search mechanisms and enhancing the diagnostic potential of the trail making test using eTMT.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of social media: A cross-national comparison.

Acta psychologica·2025
Same author

Assessing the limits on size-pitch mapping reveals the interplay between top-down and bottom-up influences on relative crossmodal correspondences.

Psychological research·2025
Same author

Editorial: The effects of music on cognition and action, volume II.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2025
Same author

Virtue Monism and Medical Practice: Practical Wisdom as Cross-Situational Ethical Expertise.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2025

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

13.6K

Crossmodal interference on counting performance: Evidence for shared attentional resources.

Claudia Del Gatto1, Allegra Indraccolo1, Tiziana Pedale2,3

  • 1Experimental and Applied Psychology Laboratory, Department of Human Sciences, Università Europea di Roma, Rome, Italy.

Plos One
|November 10, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Auditory stimuli can disrupt visual counting. When sounds and visual counting tasks are misaligned, participants tend to undercount, suggesting attention is diverted from the visual task.

More Related Videos

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.4K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

8.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2025

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

13.6K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.4K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

8.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Crossmodal Perception

Background:

  • Perceptual systems integrate information from multiple sensory channels.
  • Crossmodal interference can occur when sensory information is discordant, impacting task performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how auditory stimuli affect visual sequential counting.
  • To differentiate between auditory infiltration of the internal counter (overcounting) and attentional distraction (undercounting).

Main Methods:

  • Participants counted sequentially presented visual discs.
  • Visual stimuli were presented with synchronized/de-synchronized auditory stimuli.
  • Stimuli featured regular/irregular pacing and fast/moderate/slow presentation speeds.

Main Results:

  • Participants tended to undercount visual stimuli under challenging conditions.
  • Undercounting was observed in de-synchronized, irregular, and fast sequences.
  • Results support the hypothesis that auditory stimuli divert attention.

Conclusions:

  • Exogenous auditory stimuli primarily disrupt visual counting by drawing attention away.
  • This crossmodal interference leads to undercounting rather than overcounting.
  • Findings contribute to understanding attentional mechanisms in crossmodal interactions.