Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
Published on: May 4, 2017
Rituximab reference vs biosimilar utilization for oncology vs nononcology indications
Bonnie A Labdi1, Rim A Elbeshbeshy, Michelle Winkler
1MJH Life Sciences, 2 Clarke Dr, Ste 100, Cranbury, NJ 08512.
Rituximab biosimilar use is increasing, particularly for oncology indications and in nonacademic settings. This study is the first to analyze the real-world utilization of three US rituximab biosimilars against the reference product.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacoeconomics and Health Economics
- Oncology and Hematology
- Immunology and Rheumatology
Background:
- Limited real-world data exist on rituximab biosimilar adoption across different indications compared to the reference product.
- Existing studies primarily focus on oncology, leaving a gap in understanding non-oncology use patterns.
- This study provides the first comprehensive analysis of the utilization of three US-approved rituximab biosimilars versus the reference rituximab.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the real-world utilization of rituximab biosimilars (rituximab-abbs, rituximab-pvvr, rituximab-arrx) against the reference product.
- To analyze adoption trends and patterns by indication (oncology vs. non-oncology), labeling (on-label vs. off-label), and healthcare setting (academic vs. nonacademic).
Main Methods:
- A comparative analysis using deidentified real-world data of rituximab and its biosimilar dispensations from December 2018 to February 2022.
- Data were extracted from Trisus Medication Compare, covering 28,025 encounters across 193 facilities.
- Primary outcome: rituximab reference vs. biosimilar utilization, stratified by indication, labeling, and treatment setting.
Main Results:
- Rituximab reference product showed higher initial dispensations for both oncology (78.4%) and non-oncology (88.3%) indications.
- Biosimilar utilization significantly increased from 0.01% in 2019 to 59.9% in 2021, while reference product use decreased.
- Higher biosimilar adoption was observed for on-label indications (67.7%) and in nonacademic settings (22.2%) compared to academic settings (10.3%).
Conclusions:
- Real-world evidence demonstrates a growing adoption of rituximab biosimilars over time.
- Biosimilar uptake is more pronounced for oncology indications and within nonacademic healthcare environments.
- These findings highlight evolving treatment landscapes and the increasing integration of biosimilars in clinical practice.
More Related Videos
06:37Using Reference Reagents to Confirm Robustness of Cytokine Release Assays for the Prediction of Monoclonal Antibody Safety
Published on: September 15, 2023
09:34Dynamic Imaging of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells with [18F]Tetrafluoroborate Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography
Published on: February 17, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Tumor Immunotherapy
Bioequivalence: Overview