Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

04:40
Author Spotlight: Employing Green-Chemistry Principles for Safe and Sustainable Synthesis of Biodiesels
Published on: April 19, 2024
1.1K
Comparison of machine learning algorithms for predicting diesel/biodiesel/iso-pentanol blend engine performance and
1Selçuk University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Machinery and Technologies Engineering, 42140, Konya, Turkey.
Heliyon
|November 13, 2023
Summary
Machine learning models accurately predict engine performance and emissions using alternative fuel blends. Artificial neural network (ANN) excels in predicting brake thermal efficiency (BTE) and brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC), while extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) accurately estimates CO2 and hydrocarbon emissions.
Area of Science:
- Combustion Engines
- Alternative Fuels
- Machine Learning
Background:
- Optimizing engine performance and reducing emissions are critical for sustainable transportation.
- Alternative fuels, such as iso-pentanol and biodiesel blends, offer potential solutions to mitigate environmental impact.
- Machine learning (ML) provides powerful tools for analyzing complex engine data and predicting performance metrics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate engine performance and exhaust emissions for various fuel blends using ML techniques.
- To identify optimal iso-pentanol and biodiesel ratios for enhanced engine efficiency and reduced emissions.
- To compare the predictive capabilities of Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models.
Main Methods:
- Utilized ANN, SVM, and XGBoost models to analyze engine performance data (BTE, BSFC, exhaust gas temperature) and emissions (NOx, CO2, hydrocarbons).
- Focused on varying iso-pentanol ratios while keeping biodiesel ratios constant in diesel blends.
- Validated model performance using regression coefficient (R²), root mean square error, and mean absolute error.
Main Results:
- ANN demonstrated superior performance in predicting Brake Thermal Efficiency (BTE) (R²=0.984) and Brake-Specific Fuel Consumption (BSFC) (R²=0.958).
- SVM achieved the best performance in predicting exhaust gas temperature (R²=0.981).
- XGBoost excelled in predicting CO2 (R²=0.956) and hydrocarbon emissions (R²=0.973), while ANN showed strong NOx prediction (R²=0.959).
Conclusions:
- ANN models are highly effective for accurate engine performance prediction (BTE, BSFC).
- XGBoost models provide accurate predictions for key emission parameters (CO2, hydrocarbons).
- ML techniques offer a robust framework for optimizing alternative fuel blends in internal combustion engines.

