Mobility Assessment Using Multi-Positional MRI in Children with Cranio-Vertebral Junction Anomalies
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025
Bilateral Assessment of the Corticospinal Pathways of the Ankle Muscles Using Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: February 19, 2019
Flavie Grenier-Chartrand1,2,3, Maxime Taverne4, Syril James1,5
1Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Necker-Enfants Malades University Hospital, AP-HP, 75015 Paris, France.
Objective:
This study aimed to assess the relevance of using multi-positional MRI (mMRI) to identify cranio-vertebral junction (CVJ) instability in pediatric patients with CVJ anomalies while determining objective mMRI criteria to detect this condition.
Material And Methods:
Data from children with CVJ anomalies who underwent a mMRI between 2017 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Mobility assessment using mMRI involved: (1) morphometric analysis using hierarchical clustering on principal component analysis (HCPCA) to identify clusters of patients by considering their mobility similarities, assessed through delta (Δ) values of occipito-cervical parameters measured on mMRI; and (2) morphological analysis based on dynamic geometric CVJ models and analysis of displacement vectors between flexion and extension. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were generated for occipito-cervical parameters to establish instability cut-off values. (3) Additionally, an anatomical qualitative analysis of the CVJ was performed to identify morphological criteria of instability.
Results:
Forty-seven patients with CVJ anomalies were included (26 females, 21 males; mean age: 10.2 years [3-18]). HCPCA identified 2 clusters: cluster №1 (stable patients, n = 39) and cluster №2 (unstable patients, n = 8). ΔpB-C2 (pB-C2 line delta) at ≥2.5 mm (AUC 0.98) and ΔBAI (Basion-axis Interval delta) ≥ 3 mm (AUC 0.97) predicted instability with 88% sensibility and 95% specificity and 88% sensitivity and 85% specificity, respectively. Geometric CVJ shape analysis differentiated patients along a continuum, from a low to a high CVJ motion that was characterized by a subluxation of C1 in the anterior direction. Qualitative analysis found correlations between instability and C2 anomalies, including fusions with C3 (body p = 0.032; posterior arch p = 0.045; inferior articular facets p = 0.012; lateral mass p = 0.029).
Conclusions:
We identified a cluster of pediatric patients with CVJ instability among a cohort of CVJ anomalies that were characterized by morphometric parameters with corresponding cut-off values that could serve as objective mMRI criteria. These findings warrant further validation through prospective case-control studies.
