Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy in Malignant Biliary Obstruction
Published on: March 25, 2022
Doppler-Guided Second-Look Endoscopy in Peptic Ulcer Bleeding: A Randomised Controlled Trial.
Michael Milek Nielsen1, Ove B Schaffalitzky de Muckadell1,2, Stig Borbjerg Laursen1,2
1Department of Gastroenterology, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
Second-look endoscopy using Doppler endoscopic probes (DEPs) for peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) is safe and shows a low rebleeding rate. This approach may benefit high-risk patients, offering an alternative to initial DEP use.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Endoscopic procedures
- Hepatology
Background:
- Doppler endoscopic probes (DEPs) may improve outcomes in peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB).
- DEP evaluation competencies may not be available during initial endoscopy.
- This study investigates DEP evaluation at second-look endoscopy for PUB.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcome of second-look endoscopy with DEP evaluation in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of DEP-guided treatment at second-look endoscopy.
- To compare rebleeding rates between DEP-guided second-look endoscopy and standard treatment.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial comparing second-look endoscopy with DEP evaluation versus standard treatment.
- Patients with Forrest Ia-IIb peptic ulcers, initially treated endoscopically, were randomized.
- Primary outcome was rebleeding within 30 days; secondary outcomes included transfusions, hospital stay, and mortality.
Main Results:
- One rebleeding event (3%) occurred in the DEP group versus four (13%) in the control group (p=0.20).
- DEP evaluation identified positive signals in 91% of patients, leading to further endoscopic therapy.
- No significant differences were observed in secondary outcomes, and DEP evaluation was safe.
Conclusions:
- Second-look endoscopy with DEP evaluation is safe for PUB patients, demonstrating a very low rebleeding risk.
- This strategy may be considered for selected high-risk PUB patients as an alternative to initial DEP use.
- The study did not find a statistically significant improvement in overall patient outcomes compared to standard care.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
06:42Use of the Scissor-Type Knife During the Peroral Endoscopy Myotomy Procedure for the Treatment of Achalasia
Published on: March 3, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Peptic Ulcer Disease IV: Management
The therapeutic approach involves ensuring adequate rest, implementing drug therapy, promoting smoking cessation, making dietary modifications, and emphasizing long-term follow-up care.
Pharmacological management
The prevailing therapy for peptic ulcers involves a combination of managing the patient's current...
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...