Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cross-national patterns of COVID-19 vaccination coverage by vaccine type.

PLOS global public health·2026
Same author

In Situ Water Quality Monitoring for the Assessment of Algae and Harmful Substances in Water Bodies with Consideration of Uncertainties.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Magnetoelectric Energy Harvesting for Industrial IoT Applications: Frequency-Tunable Converter with Enhanced Performance.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Targeting the proliferation of glioblastoma cells and enhancement of doxorubicin and temozolomide cytotoxicity through inhibition of PFKFB4 and HMOX1 genes with siRNAs.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Kinetic Energy Harvesting with a Piezoelectric Patch Using a Bistable Laminate.

Micromachines·2025
Same author

Innovative buccal film delivery system for hypertension: Combining candesartan and hydrochlorothiazide.

Journal of biomaterials applications·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
10:28

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration

Published on: November 16, 2018

12.7K

Biocompatibility Testing for Implants: A Novel Tool for Selection and Characterization.

Walid Al-Zyoud1, Dana Haddadin1, Sameer Ahmad Hasan1

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Applied Medical Sciences, German Jordanian University, Amman 11180, Jordan.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
|November 14, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review simplifies biocompatibility testing for medical implants by introducing a flowchart and Python tool. It addresses the gap in selecting appropriate tests, aiding researchers in safer and more effective implant development.

Keywords:
biocompatibilityhealthimplantsmechanical property

More Related Videos

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
11:51

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

15.5K
Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo
12:19

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo

Published on: July 1, 2013

10.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
10:28

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration

Published on: November 16, 2018

12.7K
An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
11:51

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

15.5K
Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo
12:19

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo

Published on: July 1, 2013

10.9K

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Medical Device Engineering
  • Regulatory Affairs

Background:

  • Biocompatibility testing is crucial for medical device safety and efficacy.
  • Existing standards (FDA-USA, ISO 10933) are complex and lack a unified decision-making tool.
  • Biomaterial scientists and medical device developers need streamlined guidance for test selection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To bridge the gap in selecting appropriate biocompatibility tests for medical implants.
  • To develop a practical tool for navigating the complexities of biocompatibility evaluation.
  • To enhance the efficiency and accuracy of biocompatibility testing processes.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive review of biocompatibility testing principles, including chemical, mechanical, and biological characterization.
  • Analysis of standard documents from regulatory bodies like FDA-USA and ISO 10933 series.
  • Development of a decision-making flowchart and a Python-based framework with targeted questions.

Main Results:

  • A "yes or no" flowchart was created to guide initial biocompatibility testing decisions.
  • A Python code framework was developed to systematically assist in test selection.
  • The integrated approach simplifies the process for stakeholders involved in implant development.

Conclusions:

  • The developed tools (flowchart and Python code) offer a practical solution for selecting appropriate biocompatibility tests.
  • This integrated approach empowers researchers and developers for safer and more effective implant design.
  • The work aims to improve patient care and drive innovation in the medical device field.