Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026
08:39
Operant Sensation Seeking in the Mouse
Published on: November 10, 2010
13.0K
Differential genetic expression within reward-specific ensembles in mice
Carl G Litif1, Levi T Flom1, Kathryn L Sandum1
1School of Pharmacy, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, USA.
Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
|November 14, 2023
Summary
Researchers identified specific gene expression changes in the brain linked to cocaine seeking, distinct from natural reward seeking. This discovery could lead to targeted therapies for cocaine use disorder without affecting motivation for natural rewards.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Genetics
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Maladaptive reward seeking, particularly for cocaine, is a core feature of cocaine use disorder.
- Understanding the specific neurobiological underpinnings of cocaine seeking, separate from natural rewards like sucrose, is crucial for developing targeted therapies.
- The prefrontal cortex (PFC) and nucleus accumbens core (NAcore) are implicated in both cocaine and natural reward seeking behaviors.
Conclusions:
- The study successfully defined unique transcriptomic signatures for cocaine-seeking neuronal ensembles.
- These findings provide a foundation for developing clinically relevant genetic strategies to reduce cocaine-seeking behavior.
- The identified transcriptomic alterations offer potential targets to decrease cocaine seeking without impacting the motivation for natural rewards.
Related Concept Videos
01:39Epistasis
In addition to multiple alleles at the same locus influencing traits, numerous genes or alleles at different locations may interact and influence phenotypes in a phenomenon called epistasis. For example, rabbit fur can be black or brown depending on whether the animal is homozygous dominant or heterozygous at a TYRP1 locus. However, if the rabbit is also homozygous recessive at a locus on the tyrosinase gene (TYR), it will have an unshaded coat that appears white, regardless of its TYRP1...
02:32Position-effect Variegation
In 1928, a German botanist Emil Heitz observed the moss nuclei with a DNA binding dye. He observed that while some chromatin regions decondense and spread out in the interphase nucleus, others do not. He termed them euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively. He proposed that the heterochromatin regions reflect a functionally inactive state of the genome. It was later confirmed that heterochromatin is transcriptionally repressed, and euchromatin is transcriptionally active chromatin.