Effect of Mavacamten in Women Compared With Men With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Insights From EXPLORER-HCM
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Comprehensive Echocardiographic Assessment of Right Ventricle Function in a Rat Model of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Published on: January 20, 2023
Sharon Cresci1,2, Richard G Bach1, Sara Saberi3
1Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, (S.C., R.G.B.), Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Insights
Women with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) showed similar treatment responses to mavacamten compared to men, with greater improvements in health status and NT-proBNP levels. This suggests mavacamten is effective for both sexes in managing HCM symptoms.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Women with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) experience higher heart failure incidence and worse outcomes than men.
- The EXPLORER-HCM study evaluated mavacamten in symptomatic obstructive HCM patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare baseline characteristics and response to mavacamten between women and men with obstructive HCM.
- To assess the efficacy and safety of mavacamten in a sex-stratified analysis.
Main Methods:
- A post hoc analysis of sex from the randomized, placebo-controlled EXPLORER-HCM trial.
- Baseline characteristics were compared using t tests and chi-squared tests.
- Treatment outcomes at 30 weeks were analyzed using ANCOVA and generalized linear models.
Main Results:
- Baseline: Women were older, had lower peak oxygen consumption, worse health status, and higher NT-proBNP levels than men.
- Mavacamten treatment yielded similar improvements in primary and secondary endpoints for both sexes.
- Women demonstrated significantly greater improvements in health status (KCCT-CS) and NT-proBNP levels.
Conclusions:
- Despite older age and worse baseline status, women with obstructive HCM responded well to mavacamten.
- Mavacamten offers comparable efficacy to men regarding primary and secondary endpoints.
- Mavacamten provides superior benefits in health status and NT-proBNP reduction for women with HCM.
Background:
Compared with men, women with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) have a higher incidence of heart failure and worse outcomes. We investigated baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics and response to mavacamten among women compared with men in the EXPLORER-HCM study (Clinical Study to Evaluate Mavacamten [MYK-461] in Adults With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy).
Methods:
A prespecified post hoc analysis of sex from the blinded, randomized EXPLORER-HCM trial of mavacamten versus placebo in symptomatic patients with obstructive HCM was performed. Baseline characteristics were compared with t tests for continuous variables (expressed as mean values) and χ2 tests for categorical variables. Prespecified primary, secondary, and exploratory end points and echocardiographic measurements from baseline to end of treatment (week 30) were analyzed with ANCOVA for continuous end points and a generalized linear model with binomial distribution for binary end points, with adjustment for each outcome's baseline value, New York Heart Association class, β-blocker use, and ergometer type.
Results:
At baseline, women (n=102) were older (62 years versus 56 years; P<0.0001), had lower peak oxygen consumption (16.7 mL·kg-1·min-1 versus 21.3 mL·kg-1·min-1; P<0.0001), were more likely to be assigned New York Heart Association class III (42% versus 17%; P<0.0001), had worse health status (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Clinical Summary Score 64 versus 75; P<0.0001), and had higher baseline plasma NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) levels (1704 ng/L versus 990 ng/L; P=0.004) than men (n=149). After 30 weeks of mavacamten treatment, similar improvements were observed in women and men in the primary composite end point (percentage difference on mavacamten versus placebo, 22% versus 19%, respectively; P=0.759) and in the secondary end points of change in postexercise left ventricular outflow tract gradient (-42.4 mm Hg versus -33.6 mm Hg; P=0.348), change in peak oxygen consumption (1.2 mL·kg-1·min-1 versus 1.6 mL·kg-1·min-1; P=0.633), and percentage achieving ≥1 New York Heart Association class improvement (41% versus 28%; P=0.254). However, women had greater improvement in health status (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Clinical Summary Score 14.8 versus 6.1; P=0.026) and in the exploratory end point of NT-proBNP levels (-1322 ng/L versus -649 ng/L; P=0.0008).
Conclusions:
Although at baseline women with symptomatic obstructive HCM enrolled in EXPLORER-HCM were older and had worse heart failure and health status than men, treatment with mavacamten resulted in similar improvements in the primary and most secondary EXPLORER-HCM end points and greater improvements in health status and NT-proBNP.
Registration:
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03470545.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse III: Nursing Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System

