Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multisensory horizon.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Anodal tDCS over right DLPFC does not improve visuospatial working memory in schizophrenia: a single-session, sham-controlled study.

BMC psychiatry·2026
Same author

Rapid biasing effect of prior auditory contexts on bistable tritone perception.

i-Perception·2026
Same author

Does weak gamma entrainment still work? Rethinking the comfort-efficacy trade-off in 40 Hz sensory stimulation.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2025
Same author

Theta burst entrainment of human EEG using flickering light stimulation.

Journal of neurophysiology·2025
Same author

Anodal tDCS over right posterior parietal cortex reduces inter-vehicle distance variability: A driving simulator study.

Neuropsychologia·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

4.5K

Driving Frequency Modulates Correlations Between Executive Functions and Driving Performance: A Driving Simulator

Yu-Hui Lo1, Afee Chiu2, Philip Tseng1,3

  • 1Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Perceptual and Motor Skills
|November 14, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Executive functions like inhibitory control are crucial for safe driving. This study found that specific executive tasks predict driving performance, especially for less frequent drivers, highlighting the role of driving experience.

Keywords:
Iowa gambling taskdriving safetydriving simulationimpulsivity in drivingstop signal task

More Related Videos

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects
11:12

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Published on: September 18, 2012

17.4K
Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
07:25

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Published on: March 27, 2019

12.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

4.5K
Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects
11:12

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Published on: September 18, 2012

17.4K
Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
07:25

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Published on: March 27, 2019

12.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Traffic Safety

Background:

  • Driving necessitates complex cognitive functions, including executive functions (EFs).
  • Laboratory assessments of EFs may not fully translate to real-world driving performance.
  • Driving frequency influences driver skill and the relationship between EFs and driving behavior.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the predictive power of specific executive function tasks on driving performance.
  • To determine if driving frequency moderates the relationship between EFs and driving behavior.
  • To identify which EFs are most critical for safe driving across different experience levels.

Main Methods:

  • 30 participants were categorized by driving frequency (daily vs. weekend).
  • Driving performance was assessed in a simulator (braking time, lane-keeping, speed violations, inter-vehicle distance).
  • Participants completed three EF tasks: stop-signal, Iowa gambling task (IGT), and task-switching.

Main Results:

  • Stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) was the strongest predictor of overall driving performance, even with distractions and varying driving frequency.
  • The IGT predicted speed limit violations in high-frequency drivers.
  • Task-switching cost predicted lane-keeping in low-frequency drivers.

Conclusions:

  • Driving frequency is a critical factor when examining the link between executive functions and driving performance.
  • Executive function tasks are more predictive of driving performance in low-frequency (inexperienced) drivers.
  • Driver temperament (e.g., impulsivity via IGT) is a better predictor for high-frequency (experienced) drivers.