Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Motivational interviewing for students in school settings: A meta-analysis.

Journal of school psychology·2024
Same author

Pivoting Training and Coaching for an Early Numeracy Intervention During COVID-19.

Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research·2024
Same author

Do Mathematics and Reading Skills Impact Student Science Outcomes?

Journal of learning disabilities·2024
Same author

Evaluating a gated screening approach for identifying risk in kindergarten mathematics.

School psychology (Washington, D.C.)·2024
Same author

Proficiency With Number Concepts and Operations: Replicating the Efficacy of a First-Grade Mathematics Intervention.

Journal of learning disabilities·2023
Same author

Multitiered Systems of Support, Adaptive Interventions, and SMART Designs.

Exceptional children·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.0K

Measuring Instructional Interactions During Reading Instruction for Students Receiving Intervention in Middle School.

Scott K Baker1, Patrick C Kennedy1, Dean Richards2

  • 1University of Oregon, Eugene, USA.

Journal of Learning Disabilities
|November 14, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Many middle schoolers struggle with reading. While targeted interventions increase teacher-student interactions, the link between interaction frequency and improved reading skills for struggling readers remains unclear.

Keywords:
explicit instructioninstructional practicesmiddle schoolreadingregression discontinuity

More Related Videos

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age
15:00

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age

Published on: May 1, 2020

8.4K
Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish
14:43

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish

Published on: July 18, 2020

8.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.0K
Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age
15:00

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age

Published on: May 1, 2020

8.4K
Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish
14:43

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish

Published on: July 18, 2020

8.1K

Area of Science:

  • Education
  • Literacy Studies
  • Educational Psychology

Background:

  • Over two-thirds of middle school students lack proficient reading skills.
  • Explicit instruction methods show promise for improving reading outcomes in struggling readers.
  • The specific role of instructional interactions within explicit instruction is not well-defined for this age group.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the frequency and impact of instructional interactions for U.S. eighth-grade students in a targeted reading intervention.
  • To compare students receiving intervention versus those not receiving intervention regarding instructional interactions.
  • To examine the relationship between instructional interaction rates, student need, and reading growth.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a regression discontinuity design.
  • Compared 1,461 students in a targeted reading intervention with 4,292 students not receiving intervention.
  • Analyzed the frequency and impact of teacher-student instructional interactions.

Main Results:

  • Students in the reading intervention group experienced significantly more instructional interactions.
  • The correlation between interaction frequency and student need within the intervention group was minimal.
  • The relationship between the rate of instructional interactions and reading growth yielded mixed results.

Conclusions:

  • While interventions increase instructional interactions, their direct impact on reading growth for middle schoolers needs further clarification.
  • The study highlights the complexity of optimizing instructional interactions for diverse student needs in middle-grade reading interventions.
  • Findings suggest a need for more nuanced approaches to implementing explicit instruction for struggling adolescent readers.