Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease
Published on: May 27, 2022
Algorithmic fairness in cardiovascular disease risk prediction: overcoming inequalities
1Section of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark Tibor.Varga@sund.ku.dk.
Insights
Current cardiovascular risk models like SCORE2 overlook socioeconomic factors, potentially causing health disparities. Including these determinants may improve risk prediction and promote health equity in cardiovascular disease management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Disease Research
- Health Equity Studies
- Biostatistics and Predictive Modeling
Background:
- Prognostic risk prediction models aim to identify at-risk individuals for early intervention.
- Existing cardiovascular risk models (e.g., SCORE2, SCORE2-OP) are the EU standard but often neglect socioeconomic determinants.
- This oversight can lead to disparities in risk prediction and healthcare resource allocation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the limitations of current cardiovascular risk prediction models in addressing socioeconomic factors.
- To advocate for the explicit inclusion of individual-level socioeconomic determinants in cardiovascular disease risk models.
- To explore the potential of fairness concepts in cardiovascular disease prediction to reduce health disparities.
Main Methods:
- Review of current prognostic cardiovascular risk prediction models and their methodologies.
- Analysis of socioeconomic determinants' impact on cardiovascular disease risk.
- Introduction and conceptualization of four distinct fairness concepts applied to cardiovascular disease prediction.
Main Results:
- Current gold-standard models (SCORE2, SCORE2-OP) generally overlook socioeconomic determinants.
- This omission contributes to disparities in cardiovascular risk prediction and resource allocation.
- The paper introduces fairness concepts as a potential tool to mitigate these disparities.
Conclusions:
- Explicitly incorporating socioeconomic determinants into cardiovascular risk models is a key recommendation.
- The potential for these enhanced models to promote health equity requires further investigation through research and implementation.
- Fairness concepts offer a framework for developing more equitable cardiovascular disease prediction tools.
Abstract:
The main purpose of prognostic risk prediction models is to identify individuals who are at risk of disease, to enable early intervention. Current prognostic cardiovascular risk prediction models, such as the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE2) and the SCORE2-Older Persons (SCORE2-OP) models, which represent the clinically used gold standard in assessing patient risk for major cardiovascular events in the European Union (EU), generally overlook socioeconomic determinants, leading to disparities in risk prediction and resource allocation. A central recommendation of this article is the explicit inclusion of individual-level socioeconomic determinants of cardiovascular disease in risk prediction models. The question of whether prognostic risk prediction models can promote health equity remains to be answered through experimental research, potential clinical implementation and public health analysis. This paper introduces four distinct fairness concepts in cardiovascular disease prediction and their potential to narrow existing disparities in cardiometabolic health.
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Relative Risk
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures

