Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2025

The Colon-26 Carcinoma Tumor-bearing Mouse as a Model for the Study of Cancer Cachexia
08:55

The Colon-26 Carcinoma Tumor-bearing Mouse as a Model for the Study of Cancer Cachexia

Published on: November 30, 2016

16.3K

Enhancing oncological care: A guide to setting up a new multidisciplinary cancer cachexia clinic within a tertiary

Hyun Soo Ko1,2,3, Linda Denehy2,4,5, Lara Edbrooke2,4,5

  • 1Department of Cancer Imaging, The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
|November 15, 2023
PubMed
Abstract

No abstract available in PubMed .

Keywords:
cachexiacancer care facilitiesdiagnostic imagingmedical oncologynutritional sciencesphysical therapy modalities

More Related Videos

Establishment of Gastric Cancer Patient-derived Xenograft Models and Primary Cell Lines08:42

Establishment of Gastric Cancer Patient-derived Xenograft Models and Primary Cell Lines

Published on: July 19, 2019

10.2K
Establishment of a Primary Culture of Patient-derived Soft Tissue Sarcoma07:55

Establishment of a Primary Culture of Patient-derived Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Published on: April 11, 2018

14.3K

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
357
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care01:29

Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care

The management of chronic pancreatitis is multifaceted, involving a comprehensive approach that includes thorough assessment, diagnostic testing, and a variety of management strategies.
Assessment:
95