Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

531
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
531
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

703
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
703
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.8K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.8K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

38.3K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
38.3K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.0K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.0K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

896
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
896

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Traceable random numbers from a non-local quantum advantage.

Nature·2025
Same author

Joint Quantum-State and Measurement Tomography with Incomplete Measurements.

Physical review. A·2024
Same author

An atomic boson sampler.

Nature·2024
Same author

Performance of Test Supermartingale Confidence Intervals for the Success Probability of Bernoulli Trials.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same author

ChatGPT in Radiology: The Advantages and Limitations of Artificial Intelligence for Medical Imaging Diagnosis.

Cureus·2023
Same author

The Need for Action: Addressing Inhalant Abuse and Whitener Addiction Among Adolescents.

Cureus·2023
Same journal

Quantum algorithm for simulating the wave equation.

Physical review. A·2026
Same journal

Laser-free trapped-ion entangling gates with simultaneous insensitivity to qubit and motional decoherence.

Physical review. A·2026
Same journal

Subradiance of multilevel fermionic atoms in arrays with filling <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>⩾</mo> <mn>2</mn></mrow></math>.

Physical review. A·2026
Same journal

Blackbody radiation Zeeman shift in Rydberg atoms.

Physical review. A·2026
Same journal

Separation estimation of two freely rotating dipole emitters near the quantum limit.

Physical review. A·2026
Same journal

Effect of glancing collisions in the cold-atom vacuum standard.

Physical review. A·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source
12:19

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source

Published on: April 4, 2017

8.4K

Constraints on Gaussian Error Channels and Measurements for Quantum Communication.

Alex Kwiatkowski1,2, Ezad Shojaee1,2, Sristy Agrawal1,2

  • 1National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado 80305, USA.

Physical Review. A
|November 15, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Independent Gaussian error channels can make joint Gaussian measurements unusable for quantum communication tasks like entanglement swapping. This study identifies specific error channel conditions that lead to separable measurements, hindering quantum protocols.

More Related Videos

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs
06:42

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs

Published on: June 8, 2018

9.0K
Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators
09:23

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators

Published on: May 30, 2014

14.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source
12:19

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source

Published on: April 4, 2017

8.4K
Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs
06:42

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs

Published on: June 8, 2018

9.0K
Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators
09:23

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators

Published on: May 30, 2014

14.6K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum Information Science
  • Quantum Communication
  • Quantum Optics

Background:

  • Joint Gaussian measurements are crucial for quantum communication protocols such as continuous-variable teleportation and entanglement swapping.
  • Real-world quantum systems often suffer from independent Gaussian error channels affecting measurements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify conditions under which independent single-mode Gaussian error channels render all joint Gaussian measurements separable.
  • To determine the impact of these separable measurements on quantum communication protocols.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of independent single-mode Gaussian error channels acting on two quantum systems (modes A and B) prior to joint Gaussian measurement.
  • Derivation of the criteria for separability of Gaussian measurements under specific error channel models, including loss and added noise.

Main Results:

  • The study determines the exact set of pairs of independent Gaussian error channels that result in separable joint Gaussian measurements.
  • A specific condition is found for loss and added noise channels: separability occurs if the sum of loss and noise parameters (l_A + l_B + n_A + n_B) is greater than or equal to 1.

Conclusions:

  • Certain combinations of independent Gaussian error channels can render joint Gaussian measurements inseparable, thus unsuitable for entanglement swapping or teleportation.
  • Understanding these error channel limitations is vital for the practical implementation of advanced quantum communication protocols.