Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2026

Detection of Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens from Individual Filth Flies
Published on: February 13, 2015
An Alternative Rapid Confirmation Method for Identifying Listeria monocytogenes from a Variety of 125 g Food Samples
Catharine R Carlin1, Deann Akins-Lewenthal2, Benjamin Bastin3
1Mérieux NutriSciences, 3600 Eagle Nest Dr., Crete, IL 60417, USA.
Abstract:
Cultural confirmation following detection of a Listeria monocytogenespresumptive positive can take 3-7 days to finalize; this uncertainty is a point of frustration for food producers needing to make time-sensitive disposition decisions. To address the demand for shortened time-to-results, an alternative L. monocytogenes confirmation method consisting of two components, (i) a secondary screen using a different rapid method, and (ii) concurrent cultural isolation followed by next-day colony identification was evaluated. For the study, four food matrices (hot dogs, peanut butter, frozen vegetables, and multicomponent frozen meals) were inoculated with low levels (0.36-1.39 MPN/125 g) of L. monocytogenes per the AOAC guidelines for a matrix study. Analyses were performed on 125 g test portions and started with a PCR primary screen (Bio-Rad iQ-Check Listeria monocytogenes II). Next, all enriched food samples underwent a secondary screen by bioMérieux's GENE-UP LMO2 Real-Time PCR and VIDAS LMX ELFA along with streaking onto RAPID'L.mono Agar. Presumptive positive L. monocytogenes colonies were identified utilizing a high throughput rapid identification method (Hygiena's BAX System L. monocytogenes Real-Time PCR assay, Neogen's ANSR isothermal nucleic acid amplification assay, and Bruker's MALDI Biotyper). Importantly, this study evaluated multiple commercially available options for the secondary screen (n = 2) and rapid identification (n = 3) to allow for easy adoption by testing laboratories. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) between the number of L. monocytogenes-positive 125 g samples obtained by the cultural reference method and the alternative confirmation methods (regardless of which method combinations were evaluated). Additionally, this study supports that, when both the primary and secondary screen methods yield a positive result, the sample could be considered a confirmed positive for L. monocytogenes.
More Related Videos
08:24Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification for Screening Salmonella in Animal Food and Confirming Salmonella from Culture Isolation
Published on: May 20, 2020
05:34Author Spotlight: Development of an Enhanced Protocol for Rapid and Accurate Isolation of Campylobacter from Food Products
Published on: February 23, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Real Time RT-PCR
The real-time quantification of the number of amplified products is...
Rapid Identification of Pathogens