Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

13:56
Probe Type II Band Alignment in One-Dimensional Van Der Waals Heterostructures Using First-Principles Calculations
Published on: October 12, 2019
7.7K
Benchmark Data Set of Crystalline Organic Semiconductors
Andriy Zhugayevych1, Wenbo Sun2, Tammo van der Heide2
1Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
|November 16, 2023
Summary
A new benchmark dataset of crystalline organic semiconductors aids in evaluating computational methods for predicting material properties. Results show density functional theory (DFT) methods offer accurate geometries but varying unit cell volumes.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Computational Chemistry
- Solid-State Physics
Background:
- Accurate prediction of crystalline organic semiconductor properties is crucial for materials design.
- Existing computational methods require rigorous benchmarking against experimental data.
- A comprehensive dataset is needed to assess the performance of various theoretical approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish a benchmark dataset of crystalline organic semiconductors for evaluating computational methods.
- To test the accuracy of density functional theory (DFT) functionals and approximate DFT methods for predicting structural and electronic properties.
- To compare the performance of different computational approaches regarding geometry, unit cell volume, and computational cost.
Main Methods:
- Compilation of a dataset of 67 crystalline organic semiconductors with available experimental crystal structures.
- Benchmarking of r2SCAN-D3 and PBE-D3 density functionals using a subset of 28 crystals with reliable zero-temperature unit cell volume estimations.
- Evaluation of approximate DFT methods (GFN1-xTB, DFTB3) against r2SCAN-D3 across the entire dataset, including analysis of dispersion corrections.
Main Results:
- r2SCAN-D3 demonstrates high accuracy for geometries (within a few percent) but systematically underestimates unit cell volume by approximately 2%.
- PBE-D3, while faster, provides unbiased volume estimates except for highly polar bonds, where it overestimates volume.
- Approximate DFT methods yield qualitatively correct but overcompressed crystal structures without fitted dispersion corrections.
Conclusions:
- The developed benchmark dataset provides a valuable resource for validating computational methods for organic semiconductors.
- r2SCAN-D3 offers accurate geometries, while PBE-D3 presents a faster alternative with specific limitations.
- Approximate DFT methods require careful consideration of dispersion corrections for accurate unit cell predictions.
Related Concept Videos
Polymer Classification: Crystallinity
2.9K
Unlike ionic or small covalent molecules, polymers do not form crystalline solids due to the diffusion limitations of their long-chain structures. However, polymers contain microscopic crystalline domains separated by amorphous domains.
Crystalline domains are the regions where polymer chains are aligned in an orderly manner and held together in proximity by intermolecular forces. For example, chains in the crystalline domains of polyethylene and nylon are bound together by van der Waals...
Crystalline domains are the regions where polymer chains are aligned in an orderly manner and held together in proximity by intermolecular forces. For example, chains in the crystalline domains of polyethylene and nylon are bound together by van der Waals...
2.9K
Types of Semiconductors
615
Intrinsic semiconductors are highly pure materials with no impurities. At absolute zero, these semiconductors behave as perfect insulators because all the valence electrons are bound, and the conduction band is empty, disallowing electrical conduction. The Fermi level is a concept used to describe the probability of occupancy of energy levels by electrons at thermal equilibrium. In intrinsic semiconductors, the Fermi level is positioned at the midpoint of the energy gap at absolute zero. When...
615
Network Covalent Solids
13.5K
Network covalent solids contain a three-dimensional network of covalently bonded atoms as found in the crystal structures of nonmetals like diamond, graphite, silicon, and some covalent compounds, such as silicon dioxide (sand) and silicon carbide (carborundum, the abrasive on sandpaper). Many minerals have networks of covalent bonds.
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
13.5K

