Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

130
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
130
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

199
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
199
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

3.9K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inflammation Associated With Obesity, Aging, and Amyloid Burden in Adults With Down Syndrome.

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)·2026
Same author

Feasibility and Preliminary Impacts of a Stress Reduction Intervention for Caregivers of Adolescents and Young Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID·2026
Same author

Outcomes of an Exercise Intervention in Adults With Down Syndrome and Congenital Heart Disease: A Secondary Analysis.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2026
Same author

A Qualitative Exploration of Perspectives From Young Adults With Intellectual Disabilities and Their Caregivers Participating in a Lifestyle Intervention to Enhance Cooking Skills and Physical Fitness.

Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID·2026
Same author

Association of Cognition before and after Kidney Transplantation with Cerebral White Matter Integrity.

Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN·2025
Same author

Sample size justification in feasibility studies: moving beyond published guidance.

Pilot and feasibility studies·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2025

A Computerized Test Battery to Study Pharmacodynamic Effects on the Central Nervous System of Cholinergic Drugs in Early Phase Drug Development
07:02

A Computerized Test Battery to Study Pharmacodynamic Effects on the Central Nervous System of Cholinergic Drugs in Early Phase Drug Development

Published on: February 11, 2019

9.9K

A flexible test for early-stage studies with multiple endpoints.

R N Montgomery1, L T Ptomey2, J D Mahnken1

  • 1Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.

Journal of Applied Statistics
|November 16, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study enhances the prediction test for multiple endpoints, improving its accuracy and power in early-stage research. New methods address conservatism and allow for flexible predictions across various endpoints.

Keywords:
Bootstrapcorrelated endpointsmultiple endpointspilot studies

More Related Videos

An Organotypic High Throughput System for Characterization of Drug Sensitivity of Primary Multiple Myeloma Cells
09:41

An Organotypic High Throughput System for Characterization of Drug Sensitivity of Primary Multiple Myeloma Cells

Published on: July 15, 2015

8.7K
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
00:04

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

10.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2025

A Computerized Test Battery to Study Pharmacodynamic Effects on the Central Nervous System of Cholinergic Drugs in Early Phase Drug Development
07:02

A Computerized Test Battery to Study Pharmacodynamic Effects on the Central Nervous System of Cholinergic Drugs in Early Phase Drug Development

Published on: February 11, 2019

9.9K
An Organotypic High Throughput System for Characterization of Drug Sensitivity of Primary Multiple Myeloma Cells
09:41

An Organotypic High Throughput System for Characterization of Drug Sensitivity of Primary Multiple Myeloma Cells

Published on: July 15, 2015

8.7K
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
00:04

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

10.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Methods

Background:

  • The prediction test integrates information from multiple correlated endpoints.
  • It is valuable for early-stage studies to justify larger trials.
  • Existing limitations include conservativeness with small effect sizes and endpoint numbers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the limitations of the prediction test for multiple endpoints.
  • To improve the test's accuracy, power, and flexibility.
  • To extend the test for diverse null hypotheses and predictions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing a parametric bootstrap to estimate the null distribution.
  • Developing a framework for predicting differences across one or more endpoints.
  • Extending the test with a composite null hypothesis for varied endpoint importance.

Main Results:

  • The enhanced test achieves nominal error rates and increased power in small sample/effect size scenarios.
  • The framework allows for predictions of differences on selected endpoints.
  • The composite null hypothesis accommodates studies with both familiar and novel endpoints.

Conclusions:

  • The improved prediction test offers greater accuracy and power for multiple endpoint analysis.
  • The extensions provide flexibility for various study designs and hypotheses.
  • This work advances statistical methods for early-stage clinical research with multiple outcomes.