Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Simultaneous Affinity Enrichment of Two Post-Translational Modifications for Quantification and Site Localization
Published on: February 27, 2020
Influence of extraction windows for data-independent acquisition on feature annotation during suspect screening
Bastian Schulze1, Amy L Heffernan1, Maria Jose Gomez Ramos2
1The University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Environmental Health Sciences (QAEHS), 20 Cornwall Street, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia.
Optimizing data-independent acquisition (DIA) settings, like Sequential Windowed Acquisition of all THeoretical Mass Spectra (SWATH-MS), is crucial for accurate non-target analysis (NTA). The ideal number of acquisition windows depends on the sample matrix for reliable chemical identification.
Area of Science:
- Environmental chemistry
- Analytical chemistry
- Mass spectrometry
Background:
- Non-target analysis (NTA) using high-resolution mass spectrometry is vital for identifying unknown chemicals.
- Data-independent acquisition (DIA), such as SWATH-MS, is essential for comprehensive NTA.
- Acquisition parameters in DIA methods can significantly impact the detection and annotation of chemical features.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate how different DIA settings influence the confident annotation and identification of chemical features.
- To assess the impact of acquisition window number and size on NTA in diverse sample matrices.
- To determine matrix-specific optimal DIA parameters for improved chemical screening.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of environmental (river water, PSE), wastewater, and biological (urine) samples.
- Utilized 11 different Sequential Windowed Acquisition of all THeoretical Mass Spectra (SWATH-MS) methods with 5-15 variable acquisition windows.
- Evaluated true positive annotation rates, number of annotated features, and library score variations.
Main Results:
- True positive annotation rates varied by matrix, with higher rates observed in urine and wastewater using more windows (15).
- The number of annotated features was maximized in PSE and urine with specific window counts (9 and 14, respectively).
- Less complex matrices showed higher annotation rates with fewer windows (5-6), indicating matrix-dependent optimal settings.
Conclusions:
- Optimization of DIA parameters, particularly the number of acquisition windows, is critical and matrix-dependent for effective non-target analysis.
- The variability in library scores necessitates carefully curated libraries and optimized methods for reliable chemical identification.
- Achieving the best ratio of total to true positive annotations is key for successful NTA outcomes.

