Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022
Precision or Pitfall? Evaluating the Accuracy of ICD-10 Coding for Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Multicenter
Vivek Singh1,2, Josef E Jolissaint3, James G Kohler4
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-PCS) has an 81.9% accuracy rate for identifying cemented fixation in total hip arthroplasty (THA). This coding system presents challenges for data validity in registries and research.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Medical coding systems
- Health data analytics
Background:
- The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-PCS) was implemented in the U.S. in 2015.
- While proponents highlight its granularity for detailed procedural data, concerns exist regarding increased complexity leading to inaccurate and inconsistent coding.
- This study investigates the accuracy of ICD-10-PCS in identifying cemented fixation for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the accuracy of ICD-10-PCS codes in identifying cemented fixation for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).
- To assess the consistency of coding across multiple academic medical centers.
- To evaluate the implications of coding accuracy on registry data, such as that from the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of cemented primary THAs at four geographically diverse academic medical centers (October 2015 - October 2020).
- Identification of cemented fixation using ICD-10-PCS codes.
- Accuracy assessment via postoperative radiograph and chart review.
- Cross-referencing with institution-level coding data from the AJRR.
Main Results:
- Out of 552 cemented THA cases, 452 (81.9%) were correctly coded using ICD-10-PCS.
- Coding accuracy varied by institution, ranging from 72% to 100%.
- When cross-referenced with AJRR data, 66% of cases were correctly coded with ICD-10-PCS and correctly reported to the AJRR.
Conclusions:
- Discrepancies in ICD-10-PCS coding exist across institutions, potentially leading to inaccurate reporting in registries like the AJRR.
- Caution is advised when using ICD-10-PCS procedural data for research and administrative claims databases due to challenges in data validity and interpretation.
- The granularity of ICD-10-PCS does not guarantee accuracy in representing specific procedural details like cemented fixation in THA.
More Related Videos
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
09:01Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach
Published on: January 24, 2018