Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...

Decision Making: Traditional Method

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...

Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD

Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD

A complete procedure of testing a hypothesis about a population mean when the population standard deviation is unknown is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...

Types of Hypothesis Testing

Types of Hypothesis Testing

There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Measurement invariance of the perceived discrimination scale across race/ethnicity and sex: Findings from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) study.

SSM. Mental health·2026

Same author

Model-Based Person Fit Statistics Applied to the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale IV.

Educational and psychological measurement·2025

Same author

Thinking About Sum Scores Yet Again, Maybe the Last Time, We Don't Know, Oh No . . .: A Comment on.

Educational and psychological measurement·2024

Same author

Self-reported mid- to late-life physical and recreational activities: Associations with late-life cognition.

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS·2023

Same author

Computerized adaptive test strategies for the matrix reasoning subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 4th Edition (WAIS-IV).

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS·2023

Same author

Effects of early-life environment and adulthood SES on cognitive change in a multiethnic cohort.

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

A Note on Statistical Hypothesis Testing: Probabilifying Modus Tollens Invalidates Its Force? Not True!

Keith F Widaman¹

¹University of California at Riverside, USA.

Educational and Psychological Measurement

|November 17, 2023

Summary

Statistical hypothesis testing aligns with deductive reasoning, specifically modus tollens. This note clarifies that probabilistic evidence does not invalidate modus tollens in statistical inference.

Keywords:

modus tollens statistical hypothesis testing

More Related Videos

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Published on: July 30, 2020

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Published on: July 30, 2020

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Area of Science:

Statistics
Logic
Philosophy of Science

Background:

The interpretation of statistical test results has been debated in relation to deductive reasoning.
Four forms of deductive argument exist, with two valid and two invalid.
Modus tollens (denying the consequent) is often considered the sole valid analog for statistical hypothesis testing.

Purpose of the Study:

To address the argument that probabilistic evidence weakens modus tollens.
To re-establish modus tollens as a valid deductive inference in statistical hypothesis testing.
To correct flawed problem setups that question the applicability of modus tollens with probabilistic data.

Main Methods:

Analysis of deductive reasoning forms.
Examination of the relationship between conditional statements (p→q) and statistical hypothesis testing.
Probabilistic evaluation of modus tollens.

Main Results:

The argument against probabilified modus tollens is based on a flawed premise.
Modus tollens retains its deductive force even when applied to probabilistic statistical evidence.
The validity of modus tollens in statistical inference is reaffirmed.

Conclusions:

Modus tollens is a valid form of deductive reasoning applicable to statistical hypothesis testing.
Probabilistic evidence does not invalidate the logical structure of modus tollens.
The interpretation of statistical evidence should correctly employ deductive principles like modus tollens.